Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

2070 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2070 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Land Allotment to Project Affected Person. Allotment of land in lieu of acquisition cannot be cancelled without affording opportunity of hearing and without valid reasons.

The petitioner's father was a project affected person whose agricultural land at Mouje Bhugaon, Taluka Mulshi, District Pune was acquired for the Veer...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition in Buldana District — Market Value Determined Based on Sale Deeds and Potential for Development. The Court held that the Reference Court erred in not considering potential value and comparable sale instances, and compensation was enhanced.

The judgment pertains to multiple first appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings for the purpose of construction of a percolation tank at vil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Section 28A Application as Time-Barred — Limitation Period of 90 Days for Seeking Redetermination of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Is Mandatory and Cannot Be Extended.

The petitioner, Mrs. Zainabi, challenged the orders dated 14th May 2010 and 15th June 2012 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bangalore D...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Upholds Single Judge's Order Denying Enhanced Compensation. Landowners' Claim for Higher Compensation Under Section 28 of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 Rejected as Reference Court's Award Was Not Challenged.

The appellants, landowners whose lands were acquired by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) under the Karnataka Industrial Areas ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petitions Seeking Revival of Land Acquisition References Due to Inordinate Delay and Laches. Petitioners failed to appear before the Reference Court for over a decade, leading to dismissal of references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging orders of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Omerga, dismissing their Land Acquisition References (LARs...