Search Results for "distinction between public order and law and order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "distinction between public order and law and order"

3262 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3262 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator Despite SARFAESI and RDDB Act Objections — Arbitration Agreement in Sanction Letter Held Enforceable and Not Barred by Statutory Remedies. The court held that Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act and Section 18 of the RDDB Act do not bar arbitration proceedings, and the applicant's claim under the Sanction Letter dated 19th August 2019 is arbitrable.

15 Oct 2024

The applicant, Tata Capital Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines PIL for Heritage Conservation — Government's Omission of Buildings from Heritage List Without Consultation and Reasons Under Section 31 of MRTP Act Challenged. Petitioner Society Asserts That Statutory Procedure Was Not Followed and Heritage Conservation Committee's Recommendations Were Ignored.

5 May 2006

The Vidarbha Heritage Society, a registered society formed in 1997, filed a public interest litigation before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur seeking ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Land Acquisition Compensation Appeals. Claimants challenge the award of the Special Land Acquisition Officer for lands acquired for Karanjwan Dam under the Upper Godavari Project.

1 Jan 1970

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Family MoU Binding on Shareholders. The court held that a family Memorandum of Understanding containing an arbitration clause constitutes a valid arbitration agreement, enforceable under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and binding on heirs and successors.

6 Apr 2021

The appeal arose from the dismissal of a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed before the High Court of Delhi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Judgment Creditor in Execution of Hong Kong Decree, Upholding Licensee's Right to Continue Occupation and Security Interest in Flat. Leave and License Agreement Creates a Charge and Right to Possession Until Security Deposit Refunded, Not Subject to Revocation Under Sections 59 and 60 of Indian Easements Act, 1882.

2 May 2006

The case involved an appeal against an order of a Single Judge who had allowed a Chamber Summons filed by Respondent No.2, ING Bank N.V., a licensee u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Anti-Suit Injunction Restraining Husband from Pursuing Divorce Case in Dubai; Examines Principles of Comity, Forum Conveniens, and Multiplicity of Proceedings Under CPC and Specific Relief Act. The family court’s order ignoring the habitual residence of the wife and child in a foreign jurisdiction was under scrutiny for failing to apply the principles of comity and forum conveniens.

29 Apr 2013

The dispute arose out of a matrimonial conflict between husband and wife, both Indian nationals, who were married in India and last resided together i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Failure to Verify Secret Statements Renders Subjective Satisfaction Invalid, Making Detention Order Unsustainable.

3 Mar 2016

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Dipak alias D. Baba Kashinath Kamble, challenged a detention order dated 7 August 2015 issued by the Commissione...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Detention Order in COFEPOSA Case Due to Non-Supply of Vital Material and Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation. Preventive detention under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA set aside as statements of key witness not furnished to detenu, violating Article 22(5) right to make effective representation.

31 Jul 2024

The appellant, wife of detenu Appisseril Kochu Mohammed Shaji, challenged the detention order dated 31.08.2023 passed under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Criminal Appeals Against Conviction Under POCSO Act and IPC. Trial Court Conviction for Kidnapping, Rape, Murder and Destroying Evidence Under IPC and POCSO Act Upheld by High Court.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court heard criminal appeals by special leave preferred by two appellants against the common judgment of the High Court of Uttarakhand, wh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Reconveyance of Land Transferred for Electricity Sub-Station. Petitioner's claim of coercion and duress after ten years rejected as the transfer was a voluntary commercial transaction under a registered Deed of Transfer.

25 Nov 2022

The petitioner, Goan Real Estate and Construction Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of ma...

86 87 88 89 90

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)