Search Results for "Loan Recovery"

1714 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1714 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order Allowing Recall of Witness for Cross-Examination. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Inherent Power to Recall Witness Under Section 22 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 for Effective Adjudication.

The petitioners, Deepak Kochhar and Rajeev Kochhar, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to State Notification Fixing Sugarcane Price Despite Central FRP Under Essential Commodities Act. Section 6 of the EC Act Grants Overriding Effect to Central Orders Over Inconsistent State Enactments.

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging the state government's notification fixing sugarcane price and the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Sales Tax Attachment Over Bank's Secured Assets Under SARFAESI Act — Priority of Secured Creditor Upheld. Section 26E of SARFAESI Act gives priority to secured creditors over crown debts, and attachment by sales tax authorities cannot defeat the bank's security interest.

The petitioner, Union Bank of India, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an attachment order dated 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in CENVAT Credit Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Non-supply of documents and denial of cross-examination vitiated the notice under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Supermax Personal Care Pvt. Ltd., a company engaged in manufacturing excisable goods such as safety razors, blades, and shaving system...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revocation of Leave Under Clause 12 Letters Patent and Allows Amendment to Plaint on Jurisdiction. Court holds that jurisdiction is determined by plaint averments as a whole and subsequent amendment cannot cure lack of jurisdiction at the time of filing.

The plaintiff, Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court for recovery of Rs. 3,72,87,086/- with inter...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Challenging DICGC Act Provisions in Cooperative Bank Deposit Insurance Dispute. Sections 18A(5) and 21(3)(4) of the Deposit Insurance and Credit Guarantee Corporation Act, 1961, held constitutional and not arbitrary.

The appellant, Sri G.K. Gururaja Rao, Secretary of Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...