Search Results for "Defective Authority"

968 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 968 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Pronounces Order in Writ Petition No.24266 of 2021 Challenging Criminal Proceedings Against Pontiff. Court Considered Whether Delay, Cognizance Validity, and Non-Application of Mind Vitiate Proceedings Under Section 204 Cr.P.C.

The writ petition was filed by the pontiff of Shree Samsthana Gokarna Shree Ramachandrapura Math seeking to quash criminal proceedings in C.C.No.26533...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Sub-Inspector in Censure Penalty Case for Violation of Natural Justice. Censure Entry Set Aside as Imposed Without Show Cause Notice as Required Under Rule 14(2) of Uttar Pradesh Police Officers of the Subordinate Ranks (Punishment and Appeal) Rules, 1991.

The appellant, Sub Inspector Sanjay Kumar, while posted at Police Station Hanumanganj, District Khushinagar, Uttar Pradesh, was subjected to a penalty...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment in Murder by Burning Case. Conviction Under Sections 302, 307 IPC Upheld but Death Penalty Not Warranted Due to Mental Instability and Provocation.

The case arises from an incident on 14th April 2017, when the accused, Deepak Birbahadur Jath, poured petrol on Amravati (deceased) and set her on fir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Senior Police Inspector in Mansukh Hiran Murder Case - No Prima Facie Evidence of Conspiracy Under UAP Act. Court held that mere meetings and use of benami SIM card without corroboration do not establish criminal conspiracy under Sections 16, 18, 20 of UAP Act, 1967.

The appellant, Sunil Dharma Mane, a Senior Inspector of Police, was arrested on 23 April 2021 in connection with the murder of Mansukh Hiran and relat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...