Search Results for "1894"

1781 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1781 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Release of Land from Development Plan Due to Lapse Under Section 38 of Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971. Court Orders Consideration of Representation Treating 2008 Detailed Development Plan as Lapsed if No Acquisition Initiated.

The petitioner, A. Govindarajan, purchased land in Survey No.215/3, Maththi Revenue Village, Kumbakonam Taluk, Thanjavur District, from one Periyasamy...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Land Acquisition Order for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Serve Section 4(1) Notice and Conduct Section 5-A Inquiry Renders Acquisition Proceedings Invalid.

The petitioner, Yusuf Ali S/o Khader Shah Faqeer, is the legal heir of the original petitioner Khadarsha Faqeer. The original petitioner had filed W.P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses KIADB's Writ Petition Challenging Enhanced Compensation Award — Maintainability of Writ Petition Under Articles 226 and 227 Against Reference Court Award Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894

The Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging a j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determination Upheld. Reference Court's award of Rs.162 per sq. ft. for acquired land for power grid is confirmed as no grounds for interference established.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment and award dated 6.2.2016 passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagalko...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenge for Malaprabha Project Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioners' challenge to Section 4(1) and Section 6(1) notifications under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 dismissed as they failed to explain delay of over 4 years.

The petitioners, 26 individuals from Gonnagar Village, Ramdurg Taluk, Belgaum District, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening Due to Lapse of Proceedings Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Failure to Pass Award Within Two Years of Section 6 Declaration Results in Acquisition Lapsing and Entitlement to Restoration of Possession.

The petitioner, Zal Sam Cooper, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the acq...