Search Results for "tenders"

1256 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1256 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs MHADA to Pay Contractor Rs. 74,79,081 with Interest for Work Done Under Tender Contract. Court Holds That Respondent Must Pay Admitted Amount with Interest as No Dispute on Work Done.

The petitioner, a contractor and builder, filed a writ petition seeking direction to the respondent, Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Authority ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Tender Cancellation in PMGSY Contract — Violation of Natural Justice and Arbitrary Action. Tender Cancellation Without Show Cause Notice and Without Considering Lowest Bidder's Rights Held Illegal Under Article 14 and 226 of Constitution.

The petitioner, M/s. Mundhe Contractors, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the canc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Petition in Arbitration Dispute Over Bridge Construction. Arbitral Award Upheld as Not Contrary to Public Policy Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (owner), entered into a contract with the respondent, M/s. Oriental Construction Company Limited (co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Section 34 Applications Under Arbitration Act from District Court to High Court for Consolidated Hearing. Transfer Ordered Under Section 24 CPC to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings and Conflicting Decisions in Arbitration Matters.

The applicant, Atlanta Limited, a public limited company, filed this application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Matter — No Error Apparent on Face of Record in Limitation Finding. Court holds that review jurisdiction under Section 114 CPC and Order 47 Rule 1 is limited to errors apparent on record, not re-appreciation of evidence.

The review petition was filed by Hindustan Construction Co. Ltd. (the original respondent no.1 in Arbitration Appeal No. 6 of 2007) seeking review of ...