CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.935 OF 2014
2 Nov 2018The High Court of Judicature at Bombay considered three criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad-Aliba...
Search Results for "section 13(4)"
1465 result(s) found
Found 1465 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Rape and Murder of Four-Year-Old Girl. Conviction under Sections 302, 376(2)(i), 377, 363, 366, 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code Upheld for Acts Committed in Furtherance of Common Intention.
11 Jan 2018The case arises from a reference under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for confirmation of the death sentence and an appeal agains...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Construction of Shopping Complex Within Prohibited Highway Area; Directions for Demolition Sought by Shirdi Councillors Based on Violation of Building Bye-Law and Lack of No-Objection Certificate.
20 Dec 2017The writ petition concerns a challenge to the construction of a shopping complex on land bearing survey no. 170/A2/1 abutting the Nagar-Manmad highway...
- 69
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Criminal Appeal against Conviction under Section 304 IPC and Electricity Act — Accused Challenges Ownership and Responsibility for Electrocution. The court examined whether the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant owned the land where an illegal electric fence killed a woman and whether the conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder and electricity theft was sustainable given material contradictions in evidence.
25 Feb 2020The appeal arose from a judgment of conviction and sentence passed by the District and Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar, in Special Case No.14/2006, whe...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Against Partial Arbitral Awards in Koyna Hydro Electric Project Sub-Contract Dispute. Challenge to awards failing on grounds of settlement and coercion under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
8 Jan 2016The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. (th...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Nagpur Bench) Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Double Murder and Criminal Conspiracy. Convictions Under Sections 302, 120B, 364 IPC and Arms Act Based on Circumstantial Evidence Challenged on Merits.
5 Sep 2019The case pertains to the murder of Advocate Pradeep Nalamwar and Vijay Bisne, allegedly carried out at the behest of accused no. 4 Swami, the landlord...
- 13
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals of Accused in Customs Smuggling Conspiracy Case — Statements Under Section 171-A of Sea Customs Act Held Admissible as Customs Officer is Not a Court. Office Copy of Insurance Premium Debit Note Admissible Under Section 114 Evidence Act and Appraiser's Valuation Evidence Not Hearsay, Convictions Upheld.
13 Aug 1969The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against convictions by the Presidency Magistrate, Bombay, as affirmed by the Bombay High Court, for conspirac...
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Challenge to Stop Work Notice and Directions Under Regulation 58 of DCR for Greater Bombay 1991. Dispute Concerns Obligation of Cotton Textile Mill to Hand Over Land for Worker Housing and Open Spaces Immediately After Layout Approval.
11 May 2012The matter concerned two properties owned by a textile company in Mumbai: a mill at Prabhadevi and Spring Mills at Dadar. The company closed the latte...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale Not a Money Lending Transaction. The court restored the trial court's decree for specific performance, holding that the lower appellate court's finding that the registered agreement for sale was a money lending transaction was perverse and based on erroneous appreciation of evidence under the Specific Relief Act, 1963.
16 Dec 2005The appellant, Bhau Bhiku Pawar, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for sale dated 17th June, 1977, executed by Bapu Manu Dhane (or...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Recovery from Gratuity of Retired Class III and IV Employees. Recovery of excess payment made due to wrong pay fixation without fault of employee is impermissible after retirement.
22 Dec 2017The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by retired Auxiliary Nurse Midwives (ANMs) employed with Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The petitioners, J...
- 107
