Search Results for "residential order"

3554 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3554 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening of Assessment Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Invalid When Based on Same Material Already Considered in Original Assessment.

The petitioner, Siemens Financial Services Pvt Ltd, a Non-Banking Finance Company registered with RBI, filed its return of income for Assessment Year ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Indefinite Curfew Imposed Due to Burial Dispute in Mominpura Area. Court holds that curfew under Section 144 CrPC cannot be used as a permanent measure and must be proportionate to the threat.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench. The petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeals Challenging Admission of Section 7 Application by Allottees Against Corporate Debtor. The Tribunal upheld the NCLT order allowing impleadment of allottees and admitting the insolvency petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as default was established.

The judgment pertains to two appeals filed against an order dated 04.03.2024 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), New Delhi Principal B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Cancellation of Bail in POCSO Case for Misuse of Liberty. Petitioner's bail cancelled under Section 439(2) CrPC for threatening victim and tampering with evidence, violating bail conditions under POCSO Act and IPC.

The petitioner, accused No.2 in Crime No.146/2023, was charged with offences under Sections 363, 376(2)(n), 506 IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the Protec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Condemns Demolition by Municipal Corporation Under Guise of DCPR 2034 Redevelopment Scheme. Appeal from Order Dismisses Demolition as High-handed and Illegal Under Regulation 33(9) of Development Control and Promotion Regulation 2034.

The matter pertains to an appeal from order filed by M/s. Mehta & Co., a partnership firm through its partner Mr. Adarsh Varma, as original plaintiff,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused No.2 in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that accused No.2 shared common intention with accused No.1 to commit murder.

The appellant, accused No.2, was convicted by the Fast Track Court No.X, Bengaluru, in S.C.No.83/2009 for the offence punishable under Section 302 rea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of Shop Tenants Against BMC and MHADA for Occupation Certificate and Tax Waiver. Developer's Default in Surrendering Area to MHADA Cannot Prejudice Tenants Who Cooperated in Redevelopment.

The petitioners were tenants of shops in a property owned by Mumtaj Begum Shah Mohammed and others, located at Miya Mohamed Chhotani Road, Mahim, Mumb...