High Court of Bombay Disposes of First Appeal Against Motor Accident Claims Tribunal Award. Insurance Company's Challenge to Quantum of Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is Determined.
9 May 2025...
Search Results for "cross examination"
9853 result(s) found
Found 9853 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal and Upholds Conviction Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for Selling Adulterated Sweets. Accused's Right to Cross-Examine Public Analyst Recognized but Request Rejected as Vexatious and Without Merit.
7 Oct 1969The Supreme Court heard an appeal by Ram Dayal, a sweetmeat seller, against his conviction under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for sel...
- 51
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Recall Witnesses in Civil Suit. Court holds that trial court erred in dismissing IA for recall of PW-1 for further cross-examination without considering the principles of natural justice and fair opportunity.
25 Sep 2025The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.4067/2009 pending before the XV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, filed a writ pe...
- 32
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder in Trust Dispute Case — Axe Blow on Head Proves Intent to Kill Under Section 302 IPC. The court affirmed that the appellant's act of giving axe blows on the head and neck of the deceased, coupled with motive from a trust dispute, constituted murder under Section 302 IPC.
11 Mar 2022The appellant, Subhan Usman Shaikh, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of Iqbal Ayub Siddiqui, the ma...
- 148
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Conviction Due to Non-Compliance with Section 138 NI Act Requirements. The Court held that a time-barred debt is not a legally enforceable debt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and the accused successfully rebutted the presumption under Section 139.
18 Jul 2019The petitioner, Sushila Tupekar, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Gangakhed, in SCC No.76/2013 for an offence under Section 138 o...
- 60
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Eviction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 115 CPC. Tenant's Subletting Without Consent and Default in Rent Justify Eviction.
25 Oct 2017The case involves a civil revision petition filed by the tenant (Naraindas Bodaram) against the concurrent orders of eviction passed by the Trial Cour...
- 59
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Defendant in Eviction Suit Due to Misuse of Adjournments and Failure to Cross-Examine. Closure of Cross-Examination Right Upheld as Defendant Sought Repeated Adjournments Despite Last Opportunities and Costs, Violating Procedural Cooperation Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
20 Sep 2021The Supreme Court dealt with a special leave petition challenging orders that closed the defendant's right to cross-examine the plaintiff's witness in...
- 204
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes 'No Cross' Order in NI Act Case — Right to Cross-Examine Cannot Be Denied Without Giving Opportunity. Accused's Right to Cross-Examine Complainant's Witness Is a Valuable Right and Cannot Be Extinguished by Defaulting on Costs.
8 Jul 2010The petitioner, original accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articl...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Prior Partition Based on Unequal Division and Subsequent Conduct. Court holds that unequal partition does not invalidate severance of joint status and that subsequent alienations of individual shares indicate acceptance of prior partition.
3 Mar 2025The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the original defendants against a decree for partition and separate possession granted by the First Appella...
- 1425
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly Not Proved and Doubtful Identification. The court held that the prosecution failed to prove common object under Section 149 IPC and identification of accused was unreliable, leading to acquittal.
12 Jan 2022The case involves an appeal by five appellants against their conviction by the Sessions Judge, Amravati, for offences including murder under Section 3...
- 38
