Search Results for "alternate director"

1049 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1049 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition Before Bombay High Court Challenging Interest Imposed Under Section 30(4) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 for Pre-Amendment Periods. Dispute Concerned Whether Dealer Liable for Interest for Years 2005-06 to 2007-08 Under Provision Effective from 1 July 2009.

The petitioners, M/s. Taurus Auto Dealers Pvt. Ltd. and its director, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Challenge to State's Rejection of Premature Release for Life Convict. Convict's Petition Seeks Acceptance of SSRB Recommendation Despite Negative Opinion from Convicting Court.

The petitioner, a life convict, filed a criminal writ petition seeking directions to the State Government to accept the recommendation of the State Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Directs State to Accept SSRB Recommendation for Premature Release of Life Convict. Rejection Based Solely on Convicting Court’s Opinion Quashed; Court Emphasizes Objective Assessment and Reformation Under Prisons Rules and Section 433-A CrPC.

The petitioner, a life convict serving sentence for offences under Sections 120-B, 364-A, 302, and 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 8 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Validity of Reassessment Notices Issued Under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Core Contention Revolves Around Limitation Period and Applicability of Section 150 in Light of Tribunal Order Quashing Original Assessment.

The writ petitions were filed by LTIMindtree Limited, a public limited company engaged in software development and export, challenging reassessment pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction of State Tax Officer Under IGST; Confiscation of Arecanut Goods Upheld. Court Holds that Section 4 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Does Not Require Separate Notification for Cross-Empowerment of State Officers.

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern dealing in arecanut, challenged a series of orders passed by the Commercial Tax Officer (Enforcement) under t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Jurisdiction in GST Confiscation Case. Commercial Tax Officer Holds Proper Officer Status Under IGST Act Due to Cross Empowerment; Notification Only Required for Exceptions.

The petitioner, a proprietorship concern engaged in trading arecanut, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ch...