Search Results for "Section 19(2)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Section 19(2)"

959 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 959 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit Challenging Will on Grounds of Suspicious Circumstances and Lack of Testamentary Capacity. Will dated 9th March 1981 held not duly executed and attested as required under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.

29 Jan 2019

The case concerns a testamentary suit filed by Sulochana Dinanath Tarkar (since deceased, represented by her sons Sunil and Harish) seeking Letters of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Zilla Parishad in Labour Dispute — Reinstatement with Back Wages Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Continuous Service. Workman Failed to Prove 240 Days of Service in a Calendar Year Under Section 25-B of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

2 Jul 2013

The appellant, the Chief Executive Officer of Zilla Parishad, Latur, challenged the order of a learned Single Judge dated 22.11.2012 in Writ Petition ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale of Agricultural Land Enforceable Despite Non-Agriculturist Purchaser. Section 89 of Bombay Tenancy Act Does Not Bar Enforcement of Agreement for Sale Where Purchaser Is Not an Agriculturist, as the Bar Applies Only to Transfers of Land to Non-Agriculturists, Not to Agreements to Transfer.

9 May 2014

The appellant-defendant, Hetram, owned agricultural land in Gondia. He entered into an agreement for sale with the respondents-plaintiffs on 11 August...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement for Sale of Agricultural Land Enforceable Despite Non-Agriculturist Purchaser. Section 89 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 Does Not Bar Enforcement of Agreement for Sale Where Purchaser Is Not an Agriculturist.

9 May 2014

The appellant-defendant, Hetram, entered into an agreement for sale of his agricultural land with the respondents-plaintiffs on 11 August 2003 for a t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Factual Issues and Interpretation of Contractual Terms Are Not Open to Reappreciation in a Section 34 Petition.

2 Apr 2026

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30/09/2024 passed b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Appointment of Administrator for Cooperative Bank under Section 64 of Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959. Appointment of Administrator by Registrar of Cooperative Societies upheld as valid exercise of power under Section 64(1) of the Act.

3 Jul 2020

The petitioner, Sri Guru Raghavendra Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, a cooperative bank registered under the Karnataka Co-operative Societies Act, 1959, file...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking to Restrain Advocate General from Hoisting National Flag. Petitioner lacked locus standi as no legal right or public interest was involved.

6 Aug 2014

The petitioner, H.R. Vishwanath, an advocate appearing in person, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Specific Performance Claim in Furnace Oil Supply Renewal Dispute. Plaintiff Voluntarily Gave Up Relief as Renewed Contract Period Had Already Expired, Leaving Damages Claim for Adjudication.

2 May 2006

The suit was instituted by Saurashtra Chemicals Ltd, a chemical manufacturer, against Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, a government undertaking, arising fr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Defendant Company in Trust and Escheat Case — Shareholders of Dissolved Company Held Not Entitled to Sue for Recovery of Its Assets. The Court Ruled That After Dissolution Under Section 209H of the Indian Companies Act, 1913, Company Properties Vested in Government by Escheat and the Suit Was Also Barred by Limitation Under Article 120 of the Limitation Act, 1908.

20 Dec 1968

The dispute arose from the sale of plantation estates owned by a family-run limited company, Ouchterlony Valley Estates Limited (old company), to its ...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Document Marking in Specific Performance Suit — Trial Court's Discretion Upheld Under Evidence Act, 1872. The court held that the trial court's order dismissing the application for marking documents as exhibits was within its discretion and did not warrant interference under Article 227 of the Constitution.

2 Sep 2014

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 20.11.2013 passed by the Senior Civil Judge, Mapusa, dismissing their application for...

85 86 87 88 89

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)