Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act"

949 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 949 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Kolhapur Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award and District Judge's Order Dismissing Section 34 Application. The court held that the challenge to the arbitral award on merits is not permissible under Section 34 as the award is not patently illegal or against public policy.

20 Jul 2026

The appellant, Mr. Abdulgapr Maktumsab Hudali, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgmen...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Kolhapur Dismisses Appellant's Arbitration Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Upholds Arbitral Award and District Judge's Order Confirming Payment of Balance Consideration Under MoU. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Execution of MoU and Payment of Consideration Were Not Perverse and Did Not Warrant Interference Under Section 34.

20 Jul 2026

The Appellant, Mr. Abdulgapr Maktumsab Hudali, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the Judgmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Upholds Arbitral Award Confirming Sale of Partnership Assets. Concurrent findings of fact by arbitrator and District Judge under Section 34 are not perverse and not liable to be interfered with in appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Jul 2026

The appellant, Mr. Abdulgapr Maktumsab Hudali, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgmen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum to Deemed Conveyance Certificate in MOFA Dispute — Unilateral Correction of Land Area Without Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The Court held that the Competent Authority under Section 11 of MOFA cannot correct an alleged error in land area without hearing the affected society, as it requires fresh adjudication.

11 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Shri Shivam Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., challenged an order dated 6 May 2025 passed by the District Deputy Registrar and Compet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Interim Payment Order in License Fee Dispute — Sets Aside Direction to Pay Rs. 37.61 Lakhs Per Month Pending Trial. Court Holds That Order Under Order XXXIX Rule 10 CPC for Interim Payment Requires Admission of Liability or Undisputed Amounts, Not Determination of Disputed Claims.

1 Nov 2023

The Appellant, Kavis Fashions Private Limited, challenged an order dated 4 January 2021 passed by the Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Thane, allowi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Assessee's Tax Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case — CIT's Revision Under Section 263 Set Aside. The Court held that revisionary jurisdiction cannot be exercised to validate a void assessment order and directing de novo assessment would extend limitation under Section 153.

19 Oct 2020

The case involves two Tax Appeals filed by Gigabyte Technology (India) Private Ltd (the Assessee) against the Commissioner of Income Tax (the Revenue)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Enhanced from Rs.50,000 to Rs.1,00,000 per Acre Based on Comparable Sale Instance. The court held that the Reference Court erred in ignoring a contemporaneous sale deed for adjacent land, which established a higher market value under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

17 Aug 2012

The appellant, Jaysukh Raghla Patel, filed a first appeal under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenging the judgment and order dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Primary School — Resolution to Abandon Acquisition of Adjoining Land Does Not Extend to Petitioner's Land. The court held that a Municipal Council's resolution to abandon acquisition of Survey No. 34/1 and demand refund of the entire amount does not imply abandonment of acquisition of Survey No. 34/3, as the resolution specifically mentions only Survey No. 34/1.

17 Oct 2011

The petitioners, owners of Survey No. 34/3 in Chandrapur, challenged the acquisition of their land under Section 126 of the Maharashtra Regional & Tow...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellants' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Enhancement Case — Market Value Determination Based on Comparable Sale Instances Upheld. The court found no error in the trial judge's enhancement of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

5 Jan 2010

The case pertains to a land acquisition matter where the Regional Officer, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, the State of Maharashtra, a...

Tribunals

NCLAT Allows Appeal by Successful Resolution Applicant Against EPFO Claim for Pre-CIRP Dues, Holding That Resolution Plan Approved Under IBC Is Binding on All Stakeholders Including Statutory Authorities. The tribunal ruled that EPFO's failure to file claim during CIRP results in extinguishment of dues, and the corporate debtor gets a clean slate post-resolution.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two appeals arising from an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, dated 03.07.2024, which allowed an appl...

85 86 87 88 89

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)