CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3301 OF 2018
9 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "CBI investigation"
1071 result(s) found
Found 1071 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor Girl - Upholds Conviction Under Sections 376, 302 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and DNA Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
23 Feb 2022The case pertains to the rape and murder of a 16-year-old girl on 5th September 2013. The victim, a student of ITI, was last seen by her mother at Asa...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Incomplete Chain of Circumstances. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
25 Feb 2021The appellant, Mahesh Vasant Chilwante, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Osmanabad, in Sessions Case No.21/2015 for offences punishab...
- 47
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Remand Order in Murder Case for Non-Communication of Arrest Grounds. Petitioner's arrest and subsequent judicial custody held illegal as grounds of arrest were not communicated in writing as required under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section 50 of CrPC.
17 Apr 2025The petitioner, Hemanth Datta @ Hemantha @ Baby, was arrested on 17.02.2023 in connection with Crime No. 35/2023 registered at Arasikere Town Police S...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.
14 Mar 2012The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...
- 150
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Tax Superintendent in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.
14 Mar 2012The appellant, Vijaykumar Marotrao Daiwalkar, was a Tax Superintendent in the Municipal Council, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Ch...
- 70
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Application to Set Aside Order Permitting Examination of Uncited Witness Under Section 311 CrPC. The court held that without a prior statement under Section 161 CrPC, the Special Judge could not assess the necessity of the witness's evidence, and the accused's right to know the evidence was compromised.
9 Jul 2012The applicant, an accused in Special Case No.48/00 pending before the Special Judge, Bombay, for offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act and s...
- 177
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Magistrate's Order Rejecting Bail in RCC No.2/2013 — Right to Furnish Bail Does Not Forfeit Upon Filing of Charge Sheet. The court held that the accused's right to be released on bail continues even after charge sheet is filed, and the Magistrate must consider the bail application on its merits under Section 437 CrPC.
5 Mar 2013The applicant, Smt. Padmabai Dattatraya Bhojne, filed a Criminal Application under Section 482 CrPC before the Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad,...
- 53
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 was not committed within its jurisdiction as the cheque was presented and dishonoured outside Maharashtra.
11 Dec 2025The judgment concerns two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR No. 514...
- 144
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Curative Petition in Criminal Case Due to Manifest Miscarriage of Justice from Conflicting Final Orders on Same Evidence. The Court held that conflicting final orders on identical evidence constitute a gross miscarriage of justice warranting curative intervention under Articles 129 and 142 of the Constitution of India.
11 Nov 2025The Supreme Court entertained a curative petition filed by Petitioner against the State of Uttar Pradesh and another respondent. The petition arose fr...
- 337
