Search Results for "Bombay High Court guidelines"

3139 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3139 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Show Cause Notices Issued Under Repealed Drugs (Prices Control) Order, 1979. Petition Challenges Recovery of Alleged DPEA Liabilities Arising Under Paragraph 7(2) of DPCO 1979 Post-Repeal, Alleging Violation of Articles 14, 265, and 300A.

The writ petition was filed by Indian Drugs Manufacturers Association and Organization of Pharmaceutical Producers of India, acting on behalf of their...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Order Under Public Premises Act but Reduces Damages — LIC vs NIC Dispute Over Flat Occupancy. The court held that the Appellate Authority's reduction of damages and stay on execution pending High Power Committee decision was justified, but eviction order was valid.

The dispute involves two public sector undertakings: Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), the owner of a flat, and National Insurance Company Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Collector's Order in Stamp Duty Dispute — Auction Sale Consideration Prevails Over Market Value. Stamp duty on sale certificate must be computed on actual auction sale consideration, not market value, under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

The petitioner, Shweta Aditya Malhotra, purchased a property through an auction sale conducted by the Collector of Stamps, Andheri Division, Mumbai, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Motor Accident Claims, Holds Insurance Company Liable Despite Breach of Policy Conditions. The court directed pay and recover from the owner for violation of permit conditions, relying on Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on an unspecified date, involving a vehicle owned by Shrihari s/o Kalyanrao Parkale (respondent No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Metro Construction Method as Withdrawn, Imposes Costs for Abuse of Process. Court finds the petition was filed with oblique motive to pressurize the developer for personal demands, not genuine public interest.

The petitioner, Dr. Monica Matani, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court complaining about the construction method ado...