Search Results for "Article 173"

1059 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1059 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Upheld. Tenant at will cannot claim adverse possession; suit for possession based on title is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The present second appeal arises from a suit for permanent injunction and possession filed by the original plaintiffs (now respondents) against the de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age and Consensual Relationship. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and evidence showed consent.

The appellant, Omkar Dattatraya Dangat, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Petitioners in Corruption Case Involving Alleged Forgery of Will and Misappropriation of Property. Court Holds That Custodial Interrogation Not Required When Documents Are Already Seized and Petitioners Are Willing to Cooperate.

The petitioners, Eknath Ganpatrao Khadse (aged 72), Mandakini Eknath Khadse (aged 62), and Girish Dayaram Chaudhary (aged 50), filed a Criminal Writ P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Public Servants in Defamation Case for Lack of Sanction Under Section 199 CrPC. Private Complaint for Defamation Against Public Servant Requires Prior Sanction from Competent Authority.

The judgment pertains to four criminal applications filed by Vinod Sahebrao Pandhare, Santosh B. Somani, Bharat Dnyandeo Deogire, and Ashok Narayan Ga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Advocate in RTI Dispute — No Offence Under Sections 353, 323, 504, 506 IPC Made Out. Allegations of Obstruction of Public Servant Fail as Informant Not Discharging Public Duty at Time of Incident.

The applicant, a practicing advocate, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing of FIR N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Criminal Revision Applications Challenging Cognizance and Process Issuance in CBI Corruption Case. Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Not Required for Private Complaints Under Section 190 CrPC.

The judgment pertains to four criminal revision applications filed by multiple applicants challenging the order of the Special Judge (CBI) at Goa, who...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Money Lending and Forgery Case Due to Malafide Complaint and Suppression of Facts. Repeated complaint on same allegations after earlier quashing amounts to abuse of process under Section 482 CrPC.

The applicants, Anup Dodiya and Niranjan Dodiya, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashi...