WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 1338 OF 2020
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "special planning authority"
1200 result(s) found
Found 1200 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Modifies Bail Conditions for Foreign Accused in NDPS Case: Embassy Certificate Condition Unworkable, GPS Tracking Violates Article 21. The court held that alternative conditions such as impounding passport and periodic reporting are sufficient to secure the accused's presence.
8 Jul 2024The appellant, a Nigerian national, was arrested on 21st May 2014 for offences under Sections 8, 22, 23, and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic...
- 593
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 10 Months Between Release on Bail and Detention Order Held to Snap Live Link, Vitiating Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA, 1974.
3 Oct 2006The petitioner, wife of the detenu Shyam Dharmadas Amlani, challenged the detention order dated 15th October 2005 passed by the State Government under...
- 185
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Land Acquisition Notifications under Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961 on Grounds of Non-Compliance with LARR Act, 2013. Petitioners Alleged That Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Taking of Possession Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act, and That Procedural Irregularities Vitiated the Notifications.
20 Dec 2017The petitioners, owners of agricultural land in Jalna, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation ...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Considers Whether Dearness Allowance is a Fundamental Right, Hears Appeals Against High Court Mandate to Pay Central Rates. High Court's declaration of Dearness Allowance under Article 21 and direction for parity with Central Government employees challenged by State.
1 Jan 1970The State of West Bengal filed appeals by special leave challenging the orders of the High Court at Calcutta dated 20th May 2022 and 22nd September 20...
- 63
High Court
Appeal Allowed by High Court; Special Tribunal's Order Set Aside in Land Compensation Case. High Court reaffirms appellants' 1/5th share in compensation as decreed by Civil Courts, directing fair distribution and compensation repayment with interest.
4 Sep 2024The High Court allowed the appeal filed by the appellants, overturning the order of the Special Tribunal, Nagpur, in Compensation Case No.126/2017. Th...
- 373
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Sub-Classification Within Scheduled Castes for Reservation in Punjab Act. State can provide preferential treatment to more backward castes without tinkering with Presidential List under Article 341.
27 Aug 2020The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Section 4(5) of the Punjab Scheduled Caste and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) ...
- 375
High Court
High Court Allows Public Interest Litigations Challenging Direction to Execute Special Road Grant Schemes Through Public Works Department; Holds That Municipal Councils Are the Appropriate Implementing Agencies Under Government Resolution Dated 28.3.2016. Court Declares Communications Dated 13.6.2016 Illegal as They Contravened Statutory Vesting of Municipal Fund Under Section 90 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965, and Were Issued at the Behest of an MLA Without Authority.
26 Aug 2016The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, decided two public interest litigations together, challenging communications dated 13 June 2016 ...
- 170
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Petitioner Company in Reduction of Share Capital Case Under Sections 100-104 of Companies Act, 1956. Court-Ordered Valuation Found Plausible; Minority Objectors Failed to Prove Unfairness.
9 May 2014Cadbury India Limited filed a petition under Sections 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a special resolution for reduction of...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Ceiling Order Under Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 — Green Belt Land Inclusion Upheld. The Competent Authority's rejection of objections regarding inclusion of green belt land in the holding was affirmed, as the land was part of the urban agglomeration under Section 6(1) of the Act.
21 Mar 2006The petitioners, legal heirs of the original land owner Chandrakant Trimbakrao Rajebahadur (Respondent No.5), filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...
- 223
