Search Results for "false FIR"

3000 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3000 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. The court held that mere issuance of notice is insufficient; actual receipt by the accused is required for the presumption under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 to arise.

The applicants, partners of M/s. Megapolis Landmar LLP, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Matrimonial Dispute Case Due to Amicable Settlement. Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Sections 498A, 323, 504 r/w 34 IPC as Parties Have Resolved Differences and Consent Terms Filed.

The petitioners, who are the husband, mother-in-law, and sister-in-law of the respondent No. 2 (the complainant), filed a criminal writ petition seeki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Marital Rape and Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Allegations of Rape by Husband and In-Laws Found to Be Vague and Contradictory, No Offence Made Out Under Sections 376(2)(n), 377, 498-A, 494, 294, 323, 504, 506 IPC r/w Section 34 IPC.

The case involves a criminal application filed by seven applicants (husband, in-laws, and relatives) seeking quashing of FIR No. 505/2022 registered a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside for Lack of Credible Witnesses and Medical Evidence.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by three accused persons against their conviction by the trial court. The appellants, Rama Chandu Kale (accused N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Section 376(2)(f) to Section 376(1) IPC in Rape of Minor Case — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Served. Victim's Age Above 12 Years Makes Section 376(2)(f) Inapplicable, Minimum Sentence Provision Not Attracted.

The appellant, Shahanawaj Shamsuddin Bhadgaonkar, was convicted by the Adhoc District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa confirmed conviction of Appellant in Sexual Assault Case Under IPC and Goa Children's Act Due to consistent Evidence and Corroboration

The Appellant was convicted by the Children's Court for offences under Sections 341, 354, 375(b), and 376(2)(i) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Businessman in Essential Commodities Act Case — No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Allegations of illegal storage of paddy without license fail as petitioner was a trader and not a miller, and no requirement for license under the Act for mere storage.

The petitioner, Lalit Kumar Jain, a businessman and proprietor of M/s. Preetam Traders, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Consti...