Search Results for "expert witness"

1417 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1417 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in POCSO Case Due to Unproven Age and Consensual Relationship. Conviction under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) IPC and Sections 4, 6 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and evidence showed consent.

The appellant, Omkar Dattatraya Dangat, was convicted by the Special Court under Sections 363, 366A, 376(2)(n) of the Indian Penal Code read with Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings Set Aside for Ignoring Compromise Decree. Plaintiff's Sale Deed Upheld as Valid Despite Prior Partition, as Compromise Decree Confirmed Shankar's Half Share and Right to Sell.

The appellant, Dagdu Rangnath Shingan, filed a second appeal challenging the concurrent findings of the trial court and first appellate court which di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Extra-Judicial Confession. Axe assault on deceased in field leads to conviction under Section 302 IPC as prosecution proves guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Hivraj Uikey, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli for the murder of the deceased under Section 302 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Theft. Conviction under Section 135 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove dishonest abstraction of energy beyond reasonable doubt.

The present appeal arises from the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalna, in Special Case (Elec.) No.11 of 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Claimants in Railway Accident Case — Holds That Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Death Was Accidental. The Tribunal Erred in Dismissing Claim on Grounds of Untruthful Evidence and Failure to Prove 'Accidental Falling' Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The present appeal was filed by the original applicants, the widow and minor children of Jagannath Vibhute, challenging the judgment and award dated 1...