Search Results for "blood stains"

1270 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1270 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Testimony. Conviction under Section 376D IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was uncorroborated and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellants, Rohidas Manik Chavhan and Pravin Pundlik Rathod, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Darwha, in Special Case No.4/2015 fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Eyewitness Testimony and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution evidence was contradictory and unreliable.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by Ramesh Durgappa Hirekerur, Rohit Ira Mudgal, and Mahesh @ Mendis Govindappa Bovi against their convi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal by Convict Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC for Murder and Robbery. The Court Examines the Admissibility of Test Identification Evidence and Recovery of Articles Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, original accused no. 1, under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction for Murder Under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC, Focusing on Deficiencies in Circumstantial Evidence and Procedural Lapses

The appeal arose from a conviction for murder and destruction of evidence under Sections 302 and 201 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 18...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Criminal Appeal No. 336 of 2004

The appellants, original accused Nos. 1 to 3, were convicted by the 4th Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur, in Sessions Case No. 97 of 2002 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence — Chain of Circumstances Incomplete, Extra-Judicial Confession Weak. The court held that suspicion cannot replace proof beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 302 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals of Devi Lal and Babu Lal, setting aside their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 120B of the Indian ...