KAHC010000532013_1
16 Mar 2021...
Search Results for "acquisition notice"
3185 result(s) found
Found 3185 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Industrial Development Corporation — Petitioners Failed to Show Any Legal Right or Entitlement to Compensation Under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
9 Oct 2017The petitioners, Shaikh Kalim Shaikh Mohammad and Sayanoorbee w/o Shaikh Mohammad, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad ch...
- 22
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Redetermination Under Section 28(A) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Limitation Period Computed from Date of Knowledge of Award. Petitioners' application for redetermination of compensation held within limitation as time runs from date of knowledge of the award, not from the date of award.
25 Jan 2012The petitioners, whose lands were acquired for the Mukane Dam Project, sought redetermination of compensation under Section 28(A) of the Land Acquisit...
- 53
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.
7 Aug 2019The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...
- 361
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Interest Claim — Limitation Period for Suit Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Is Three Years. Suit filed after 11 years from compensation payment held barred by limitation.
6 Feb 2012The case involves a second appeal filed by the State of Maharashtra and the Executive Engineer against the judgment and decree of the lower appellate ...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Award Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Section 11A Held Inapplicable to Declarations Made Before Its Insertion, Award Not Invalid for Delay.
18 Mar 2005The petitioners, owners of land Survey No.129 Hissa No.2 at village Jambhe, challenged the validity of the Award dated 31st October, 1992, under Secti...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Deletion of Land from Acquisition Proceedings — Land Already Vested in State Under Section 16 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that once possession is taken, the land vests absolutely in the State and cannot be withdrawn, and the petition is barred by delay and laches.
30 Aug 2006The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No. 148/1 admeasuring 81 Ares in Village Belha, Taluka Junnar, District Pune, filed a writ petition in ...
- 180
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case, Upholds Additional Compensation for Dharoi Canal Project. Court Relies on Coordinate Bench Precedent for Same Village and Common Group, Finding No Ground to Interfere with Reference Court's Award.
18 Feb 2026The present appeal was filed by the State under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 read with Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908...
- 72
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Respondent's Right to Compensation in Land Acquisition Dispute — Aforamento Grant Confers Absolute Title After Payment of Foro for 20 Years. The court held that the respondent, as heir of the aforamento grantee, is entitled to the entire compensation under Section 30 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, rejecting the appellant Comunidade's claim based on revenue records.
26 Apr 2018The case involves a land acquisition dispute where the Government acquired 12,800 sq.mtrs from survey no.89/2 of village Chorao for a Village Panchaya...
- 72
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaint Rejection Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court held that only plaint averments are relevant for rejection and limitation is a mixed question of fact.
2 Jan 2018The appellant, as plaintiff, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 26.11.1984 executed by A. Gundappa in respect of four...
- 103
