Search Results for "Section 164 statement"

1406 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1406 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Penetrative Sexual Assault Allegation Fails as Victim's Statements to Doctor and Magistrate Did Not Mention Digital Penetration, and Material Evidence Like Knickers Was Not Produced.

The appellant, Chatur @ Chetan Maroti Meshram, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, for offences under Section 376-AB IPC and S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape of Minor Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC and Section 3(1)(xii) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Satish s/o Ramesh Nandre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Dhule, for offences under Section 376(2)(f) of the Indian Penal Code and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 21 and 23 of NDPS Act for Export of Heroin to Mauritius; Conviction Based on Voluntary Statements and Evidence from Mauritius Authorities.

The appeal challenged the conviction and sentence of the appellant by the Special Judge (NDPS), Brihan Mumbai in NDPS Special Case No.59 of 1998. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive and last seen theory beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Venkati s/o Balaji Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, for the murder of his half-brother Tukaram under Sec...