Search Results for "Sarla Verma Case"

879 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 879 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Enhances Compensation for Death of a 19-Year-Old Student. Court holds that future prospects must be considered even for non-earning deceased, and multiplier should be based on age of deceased, not claimant.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the appellants, parents of a 19-year-old deceased student, under Section 166 of the Moto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Incorrect Age Assessment and Omission of Future Prospects and Consortium. The Court Enhanced Compensation from Rs. 3,50,000 to Rs. 8,10,000 by Taking Deceased's Age as 48 Years and Applying 25% Future Prospects.

The appeal arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Baban Dethe, died in a vehicular accident. The claimants, his wife, son, and daughte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows MSRTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Wrong Deduction for Personal Expenses of Unmarried Deceased. Tribunal's multiplier of 17 upheld but deduction for personal expenses corrected from 1/3rd to 50% as per Sarla Verma guidelines.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where Vinod, a 22-year-old unmarried man, died after falling from a city bus on 9 September 1993. His pare...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Motor Accident Claim. Claimant with Permanent Disability Awarded Rs. 5,00,000 Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Bano @ Banubi Rashid Shaikh, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for injurie...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Proved Despite Absence of Eye-Witness. Claimant entitled to compensation as rash and negligent driving established through documentary evidence and circumstances under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Nitin Narayanrao Magar, filed a claim petition under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking compensation for the death of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Enhanced for Death of Homemaker. Notional Income Assessed at Minimum Wages with Future Prospects and Pain and Suffering Awarded, Enhancing Award from Rs. 2,50,000 to Rs. 9,90,000.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the appellants (claimants) before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux.), Vadodara, s...