Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

1973 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1973 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes RTA Resolution Mandating 1300 cc Engine for Contract Carriage Permits — Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Regional Transport Authority Cannot Impose Conditions Beyond Those Specified in Section 74 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The petitioner, Mumbai Pune Taxi Owners Association, a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, comprising taxi owners operating...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Premium Claim Under REP Circulars — Policy Change Prospective, No Vested Right to Premium on Licenses Issued Prior to Amendment.

The petitioners, Kagaz Packaging (a partnership firm) and its partner Ms. Rajul Manoj Shah, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Bank's Possession Under SARFAESI Act — Alternative Remedy Before DRT Must Be Exhausted. Writ Petition Not Maintainable as SARFAESI Act Provides Complete Mechanism for Aggrieved Persons Under Section 17.

The petitioners, Dr. Anil Nandkishor Tibrewala and his wife, owned a flat in Mumbai. They had mortgaged the flat to Jammu and Kashmir Bank Ltd. (respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Retrenchment Case. Termination of Probationer Without Notice or Compensation Under Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal as Employer Failed to Prove Unsatisfactory Work.

The Petitioner, M/s R. Nawroji & Co., a partnership firm running a printing press, appointed the First Respondent, Francis E. Lobo, as a Machine Opera...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Trial Court's Order Permitting Re-examination of Complainant's Witness in NI Act Case. Court holds that once a witness is discharged, recalling for further examination is impermissible without justifiable cause under Section 311 CrPC.

The applicant, Anil s/o Govindrao Chaudhari, challenged two orders passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nagpur dated 14/9/2012 and 15/01/20...