Search Results for "tenant determination"

971 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 971 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Notice Under Section 478 of BPMC Act. Repair Work by Appellant Not Covered by Section 478 as It Was Not Urgent or Necessary for Safety.

The appellant, Ashok Ambadas Gangane, filed two second appeals against the respondents, M/s. Shubhamangal Builders and Others, and Pune Municipal Corp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Claims for Damages Against Plaintiff for Wrongful Arrest of Cargo in Admiralty Suit — Undertaking Under Rule 941 of Bombay High Court (OS) Rules Not Enforceable After Suit Withdrawal Without Adjudication on Merits.

The Plaintiff, Navbharat International Ltd., filed an admiralty suit and obtained an ex-parte order dated 12th January 2010 for arrest of cargo on boa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Landlords' Petition Against MRT Order Remanding Purchase Price Fixation in Tenancy Dispute. MRT Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Ordering De Novo Fixation Without Setting Aside ALT's Determination.

The petitioners, landlords of agricultural lands, challenged an order dated 27 April 1992 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) in a revisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Probate Caveat Case — Real Brother Has Caveatable Interest as Creditor and Under Family Settlement. Section 284 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 interpreted to include persons with slight interest in estate.

The case involves an appeal against an order of a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing a caveat filed by the appellant, Purushotta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Amendment to DCR 33(7) Appendix III for Lack of Locus Standi and Bonafides. Petitioner failed to establish any public interest or personal injury, leading to dismissal with costs.

The petitioner, Mr. Imran Suleman Qureshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the Bombay High Court challenging an amendment dated 21/05/2011...