WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2317 OF 2019
19 Dec 2019...
Search Results for "regulatory power"
1105 result(s) found
Found 1105 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Enhanced Liquor Licence Fee by Municipal Corporation. Enhancement of licence fee from Rs. 500 to Rs. 3000 per year held valid under Section 38 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 and Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.
9 Dec 2005The appellant, Kolhapur Zilla Rajya Abkari Parvana Dharak Samajik Seva Sangh, an association of country liquor retailers, filed a suit against the Kol...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Electricity Bill Disconnection for Non-Payment. Held that the Electricity Ombudsman's order directing payment of arrears before reconnection was valid and within jurisdiction under Section 42(6) of the Electricity Act, 2003.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Mr. Awadesh S. Pandey, a proprietor of Sunshine Plastic Industries, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombu...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Architect's Petition Against Municipal Commissioner's Order in Architects Act Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Hearing. The court set aside the order dated 15th April 2011 passed by the Municipal Commissioner of Pune Municipal Corporation without hearing the petitioner, a registered architect under the Architects Act, 1972.
29 Jun 2015The petitioner, a registered architect under the Architects Act, 1972, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 1...
- 93
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Service Agreement Dispute. Court holds that an arbitral award granting refund of mobilization advance and damages for breach of contract does not warrant interference under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
19 May 2026The petitioner, Hind Offshore Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order d...
- 276
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in NI Act Case — Restores Conviction for Cheque Dishonour. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless accused rebuts with probable defence.
6 Jan 2023The appeal was filed by the complainant, Smt. G. Suma, challenging the judgment of acquittal dated 29.01.2011 passed by the Presiding Officer, Fast Tr...
- 112
High Court
Karnataka High Court Upholds Rule 4(2)(a) of Karnataka Pre-University Education Rules, 2006 Requiring Prior Approval for Opening New Pre-University Colleges. Education Trust's Challenge Dismissed as Rule is Valid and Not Ultra Vires.
28 Nov 2019The appellant, Chetana Education Trust, an education trust established to provide education to children in Karnataka, had established 13 pre-universit...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions for Compensation in Electricity Supply Disputes — Petitioners Failed to Establish Negligence or Deficiency in Service. Claims for damages due to alleged electrical accidents and improper billing were rejected as the court found no statutory violation or breach of duty by BESCOM under the Electricity Act, 2003.
16 Oct 2017The judgment pertains to multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various individuals against the Beng...
- 89
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Seeking Compensation for Electricity-Related Losses Against BESCOM — Petitioners Failed to Establish Negligence or Deficiency in Service. Claims for damages due to alleged electrical faults and transformer failures rejected as no evidence of negligence or breach of duty by the electricity supply company was provided.
16 Oct 2017The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by individuals against the Bengaluru Electricity Supply Company (BESCOM) and others, seeking compe...
- 122
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Seizure of Motor Vehicles for Tax Arrears — Held That Procedure Under Section 8 of Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 Must Be Followed Before Detention. The court quashed the seizure of vehicles by the respondents for non-compliance with mandatory notice and hearing requirements under Section 8 of the Act.
10 Mar 2016The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the seizure and detention of m...
- 138
