Search Results for "reference jurisdiction"

14835 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14835 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010131542020_1

The matter arose from two writ petitions filed by M/s. Chamundeshwari Electricity Supply Corporation Limited, a Government company engaged in electric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 1338 OF 2020

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Overrules Res Judicata Objection in Admiralty Limitation Suit; Prior Withdrawal of Application Before Chinese Court Does Not Bar Fresh Suit Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from a voyage of the vessel M.V. YURIY ARSHENEVSKIY, owned by Murmansk Shipping Company, a Russian entity, which was chartered to ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Summons Issued Under Section 126 BNSS for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. The Court Holds That Executive Magistrate Must First Pass Order Under Section 130 BNSS Before Issuing Summons.

The writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenged the summons dated 30.09.2025 issued by the Executive Magistrate (Respondent No.3) unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Locus of Parents in Fee Regulation. Individual parents held to have standing under Maharashtra Educational Institutes (Regulation of Fees) Act to approach Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee.

The Bombay High Court heard two writ petitions challenging the locus of individual parents to approach the Divisional Fee Regulatory Committee (DFRC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Company Petition for Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement and Reduction of Share Capital. Petition Seeks to Restructure Debts and Reduce Capital Under Sections 391, 392, and 102 of the Companies Act, 1956.

This matter pertains to a company petition filed by Sharp Industries Limited under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Maritime Board Dispute Over Cargo Handling Charges. Court sets aside majority award directing payment at Rs.3 per metric tonne, remits matter for fresh consideration on applicability of 1995 or 1996 policy.

The Maharashtra Maritime Board (Claimant) filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging a m...