KAHC010137812018_1
14 Jan 2019...
Search Results for "negative response"
1028 result(s) found
Found 1028 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Reinstatement of CRPF Constable in Termination Case — Termination Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Rule 5(1) of CCS (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965. The court held that termination without proper notice and without considering the employee's representation was illegal and arbitrary.
28 Feb 2019The case involves a writ appeal filed by the appellants (CRPF authorities) against an order of a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka d...
- 58
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Deduction of 50% Towards Personal Expenses for a Bachelor Deceased. Tribunal's award of Rs.19,57,950/- modified to Rs.13,05,300/- with 9% interest per annum.
2 Apr 2019The appeal was filed by the insurance company challenging the judgment and award dated 15.07.2016 passed by the Principal Motor Accident Claims Tribun...
- 129
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Owner's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Evidence on Licence Breach. The court enhanced compensation from Rs.82,500/- to Rs.2,37,800/- for a tailor who suffered 30% disability in a road accident, applying multiplier 16 and notional income of Rs.6,000/- per month under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
17 Jun 2019The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, Smt. Channawwa, a 32-year-old tailor, sustained injuries including fr...
- 80
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Injured Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Owner's Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Evidence on Driving Licence Violation. The court held that the owner failed to prove breach of policy conditions regarding driving licence, and thus the owner is liable to pay compensation under Section 149(2) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
17 Jun 2019The case involves two appeals arising from a motor accident claim. The claimant, Smt. Channawwa, was injured in a road accident involving a goods lorr...
- 103
High Court
Gujarat High Court Allows Second Appeals in Rent Fixation Cases, Remands for Fresh Consideration. Court Holds That Appellate Court Erred in Dismissing Appeals Without Merits Under Section 11(3) of Bombay Rent Act.
3 Mar 2026The present batch of Second Appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arises from a common judgment and order passed by the lear...
- 79
High Court
Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Sudden Provocation - Conviction under Section 302 IPC Converted to Section 304 Part I IPC. The court held that the act was committed during a sudden quarrel without premeditation, falling under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, and thus the offence was culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
25 Mar 2026The present criminal appeal was filed by the appellant-accused, Chetanbhai Ravjibhai Chauhan, under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, ...
- 134
High Court
Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal by Northern Railways Challenging Arbitral Award in Solar Power Plant Contract Dispute. Court Holds That No Grounds Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Were Established as the Award Was Based on Evidence and a Plausible Interpretation of the Contract.
16 Mar 2026The case involves an appeal by Northern Railways against the dismissal of its application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19...
- 45
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Counter-Claim in Civil Suit Under Order VIII Rule 6A CPC — Rejects Trial Court's View That Counter-Claim Must Be Filed Only After Written Statement. The court held that a counter-claim can be filed after written statement but before settlement of issues, and the trial court's rejection was erroneous.
15 Jun 2026The petitioners, Mandar Suresh Bhatwadekar and Dr. Shrirang Arun Limaye, were defendants in two civil suits (RCS/2249/2019 and RCS/2248/2019) filed by...
- 248
High Court
Madras High Court Quashes Restrictive Tender Condition in Election Webcasting Case — Condition Requiring 50% Turnover from Webcasting Services Held Arbitrary. The court held that such a condition violates Article 14 of the Constitution as it is not proportionate to the objective of ensuring technical capability.
17 Mar 2026The petitioner, Innovatiview India Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act and engaged in providing advanced surveillance and webcasti...
- 20
