Search Results for "Majority rule"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Majority rule"

2458 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2458 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Consumer Protection Rules 2020 on Selection Committee Composition and Tenure. Petitioners challenge Rule 6(1) and Rule 10(2) of the Consumer Protection Rules, 2020 as violative of separation of powers and arbitrary, seeking declaration of eligibility for re-appointment.

20 Oct 2023

The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, heard three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 6(1) and Rule 10...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Banks' Appeals in RBI Fraud Classification Case Regarding Natural Justice Requirements. Court Holds No Absolute Right to Personal Hearing or Full Forensic Audit Report Disclosure Under RBI Master Directions Issued Under Section 35A Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

7 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from the classification of loan accounts as 'fraud' by banks under the Reserve Bank of India's Master Directions. The appellant bank...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

14 Sep 2016

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Reference of Questions of Law to Larger Bench in Review Petition — Maintainability of Reference Affirmed. The Court held that its power to refer questions of law to a larger bench in a review petition is not barred by Order XLVII of the Supreme Court Rules, 2013, and can be exercised under Article 142 to do complete justice.

10 Feb 2020

The judgment arises from a reference made by a three-judge bench in review petitions against the Supreme Court's 2018 judgment in Indian Young Lawyers...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Panchayat Election Schedule During COVID-19 Pandemic — State Election Commission's Power to Conduct Elections Under Article 243K and Goa Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 Upheld. The court held that the election schedule was not arbitrary and that the Commission had taken adequate safety measures, dismissing petitions challenging the schedule.

11 Dec 2020

The petitioners, who were candidates or intending candidates for the Goa Panchayat elections, challenged the election schedule notified by the Goa Sta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Counter-Claim in Civil Suit Under Order VIII Rule 6A CPC — Rejects Trial Court's View That Counter-Claim Must Be Filed Only After Written Statement. The court held that a counter-claim can be filed after written statement but before settlement of issues, and the trial court's rejection was erroneous.

15 Jun 2026

The petitioners, Mandar Suresh Bhatwadekar and Dr. Shrirang Arun Limaye, were defendants in two civil suits (RCS/2249/2019 and RCS/2248/2019) filed by...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Appellants Fail to Prove Entitlement to Share of Compensation. The court held that the appellants, claiming as legal heirs of the deceased, did not establish their right to the compensation amount deposited in court, as the suit was barred by limitation and the claim was not supported by evidence.

29 Nov 2021

The appellants, Sathish Kumar T.V. (minor) and Rangamma, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses/Allows Appeals Against Interim Orders Restraining LCIA Arbitration in Convertible Debentures Dispute. Court Examines Whether Civil Suit to Restrain Arbitration is Maintainable Under Section 5 of Arbitration Act and Interprets Arbitration Clause.

26 Sep 2025

The litigation arises from a dispute over a Compulsorily Convertible Debentures Subscription and Securities Holders Agreement dated 21.06.2013 between...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Uttar Pradesh Reservation in Promotion Rules Under Articles 16(4A) and 16(4B) of Constitution. Conflicting High Court Decisions on Requirement of Quantifiable Data for Backwardness and Inadequacy of Representation Lead to Appeals.

1 Aug 2026

The case originated from a batch of civil appeals preferred by the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. and the State of Uttar Pradesh challenging conflicting ...

83 84 85 86 87

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)