Search Results for "Article 227 writ jurisdiction"

3512 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3512 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance. Amendment Seeking to Change Suit from Specific Performance to Declaration of Title and Possession Held Impermissible as It Introduces Inconsistent Case and Is Barred by Limitation.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 01.08.1994 executed by the predecessor-in-ti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Concurrent Findings of Revenue Authorities in Pond Land Dispute. High Court Exceeded Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 by Reappreciating Evidence Without Perversity.

The dispute pertains to Khasra No.103 (formerly Khasra No.84) in Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh. In 1970, the land was recorded as 'Johad (Pond)' in revenue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Deduction of Rs.90/MT by Karnataka Power Corporation Limited from Coal Bills — Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioners, M/s. EMTA Coal Limited and M/s. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Minor Penalty on Government Employee in Disciplinary Proceeding for Unauthorized Absence. Withholding of One Increment for Two Years Held Proportional Under Rule 11(iv) of CCS (CCA) Rules, 1965.

The petitioner, Mr. Hanamatrao M. Kulkarni, was a Junior Engineer (Electrical) in the Electricity Department, Government of Goa, recruited in 1983. He...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact on Subletting Upheld. Tenant Failed to Prove Alleged Subletting by Landlord, and High Court Declined to Interfere Under Article 227 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Dr. Bhaskar Shripad Galande, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging the judgment and decree passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Property Dispute Between Brothers. Court Held That Article 227 Cannot Be Used to Re-Appreciate Evidence Unless Findings Are Perverse or Based on No Evidence.

The petitioner, Ramchandra Tatyaba Ingale, was the original defendant No.2 in a suit filed by Mugutrao Balasaheb Ingale (since deceased, represented b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Return of Plaint in Co-operative Dispute Over OTS. Guarantor's Dispute Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Held Not Maintainable After Issuance of Recovery Certificate Under Section 101.

The petitioners, Mr. Sadanand Belvalkar and another, were guarantors to a loan sanctioned by Vidya Sahakari Bank Limited (respondent no. 2) to M/s Mbe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Refusal of Interim Relief in Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Licensee Cannot Claim Protection of Rent Control Legislation After Termination of License.

The petitioners, Skygourmet Catering Private Limited and WAH Restaurants Private Limited (formerly Mars Restaurants Private Limited), filed a writ pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Bharat Petroleum in Eviction Suit — Concurrent Findings of Valid Tenancy Termination and Mesne Profits Upheld. Small Causes Court Had Jurisdiction Under Presidency Small Causes Courts Act, 1882 and Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The petitioner, M/s. Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (defendant), challenged the judgment and decree dated 30th January, 2002 passed by the Court...