Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

1111 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1111 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Insolvency Notice in Debt Recovery Matter — Debt Recovery Tribunal's Decree Constitutes a Final Judgment Under Section 9(2) of Presidency-Towns Insolvency Act, 1909.

The judgment debtor, Deepak Cochhar and another, filed a notice of motion seeking to set aside Insolvency Notice No. N/72 of 2004 issued by the Insolv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Loan Guarantee Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found. Guarantor's Liability Upheld Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Arbitrator's Findings Were Based on Evidence and Not Perverse.

The petitioner, Shantanu Shreedhar Sheorey, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Third-Party Claim in Execution Proceedings -- Appellant Fails to Remove Property Attachment for Arbitral Award Recovery -- Mother of Company Director Cannot Defeat Creditor's Rights as Post-Award Purchaser

The Supreme Court upheld the attachment of property in execution of an arbitral award, rejecting the third-party claim by Appellant who had purchased ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Insurance Claim Dispute — Underinsurance Calculation Upheld as Not Perverse. Court finds no patent illegality in tribunal's assessment of 55% underinsurance on replacement value basis.

The petitioner, M/s Lift and Shift India Pvt. Ltd., imported a second-hand crawler crane in 2004 and insured it with the respondent, M/s Iffco Tokio G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Share Purchase Agreement Dispute. Court upholds award directing payment of consideration for shares, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Petitioner, Sonoma Management Partners Pvt. Ltd., filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an a...