Search Results for "third party purchaser"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "third party purchaser"

1247 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1247 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Manufacturer in Central Excise Valuation Dispute — Voluntary Charitable Donation (Dharmada) Not Part of Transaction Value Under Section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944. Court Holds That Only Consideration for Sale of Goods or Additional Consideration in Connection with Sale Can Be Included; Voluntary Payment for Charity Falls Outside Scope.

9 Apr 2019

The appellant-assessee, M/s D.J. Malpani, manufactured goods falling under Chapter 24 of the Central Excise Act, 1944. While selling goods, the appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award Holding Put and Call Options in Share Purchase Agreement as Enforceable. The court held that clauses 8.5 and 8.5.1 of the Share Purchase Agreement are not forward contracts or derivatives under SCRA and SEBI circulars, and the Single Judge erred in setting aside the award.

2 Feb 2023

The appellants, Percept Finserve Private Limited and Percept Limited, entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with Edelweiss Financial Services Limite...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell Agricultural Land — Plaintiff Proves Readiness and Willingness. The court held that the appellant had continuously shown readiness and willingness to perform the contract, and there was no valid ground to deny specific performance under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

20 Nov 2013

The appellant, Shrikrishna Ganuji Sonone, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell an agricultural field (Gat No.36, admeasuring ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Courts Below Upheld. Court holds that plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

17 Nov 2025

The appellants (original plaintiffs) filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 read with Order XLII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Possession and Title Based on Registered Sale Deed.

4 Aug 2022

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction in respect of three agricultural properties. He claimed to have...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Res Judicata Case — Suit Not Barred as Earlier Suit Was Withdrawn Without Liberty to File Fresh Suit. Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Application Rejected as Earlier Suit Was Not Decided on Merits.

29 Jun 2017

The revision application arose from an order of the 7th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur, rejecting the defendant's application under Order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Maharashtra Tax on Lotteries Act, 2006 — Lottery Tickets Held to Be Goods Taxable Under State Sales Tax. Sub-distributor of Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland lotteries fails to prove Act ultra vires; court rules that sale of lottery tickets within Maharashtra is taxable under Entry 54 List II.

2 Nov 2018

The petitioner, a proprietor of Sri Mangal Murti Marketing, carrying on business as a sub-distributor of State-organized lotteries of Arunachal Prades...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Quashing of FIR Against Trustees for Alleged Misappropriation of Trust Land. Absence of Dishonest Intention and Individual Ownership of Sold Property Raised to Negate Offences Under Sections 420, 406, 467, 471 IPC and Sections 66A, 67 MPT Act.

28 Sep 2016

The case involved two criminal applications filed by former office-bearers of a public trust before the Bombay High Court seeking quashing of an FIR a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Revenue Appeal on Allowability of Redemption Fine as Business Expenditure Under Section 37 of Income Tax Act. The Appeal Raises the Question Whether Payment of Redemption Fine for Illegal Import of Goods Qualifies as Business Expenditure Under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

22 Feb 2019

In this appeal before the Bombay High Court, the Revenue challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had allowed a deduction of Rs...

High Court

SALES TAX REFERENCE NO. 52 OF 2009

8 Feb 2019

The matter came before the Bombay High Court as two sales tax references arising from the assessment of M/s. Radhasons International, a partnership fi...

82 83 84 85 86

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)