Search Results for "res judicata not made out"

946 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 946 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Interest Income Classification. Interest income from bank deposits, intercorporate deposits, call money, debentures, and from Income Tax Department held not to be business income for deduction under Section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Revenue Department filed appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Claim for Lack of Evidence of Ownership and Possession. Petitioners failed to prove title or possession of acquired land, and claim was barred by limitation and res judicata.

The petitioners, claiming to be the heirs of the original owner, filed a writ petition seeking compensation for land acquired by the State of Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions and Sets Aside Magistrate’s Order Refusing Release of Attached Property in Cheque Bounce Cases. No Limitation Under Section 85 CrPC for Restoration After Acquittal; Earlier Rejection of Third-Party Application on Locus Not a Bar.

The dispute arose from complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 filed by Respondent No.2, a company, against the Petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Wakf Tribunal's Refusal of Temporary Injunction in Property Possession Suit. Wakf Board's Claim of Public Wakf Property Supported by Registration and Gazette Notification.

The Maharashtra State Board of Wakf filed a Civil Revision Application under Section 83(9) of the Wakf Act, 1995, challenging an order of the Wakf Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. No Substantial Question of Law Arises as Courts Below Concurrently Held That Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Land.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of title and possession over agricultural land. The trial court dismissed the suit, ...