Search Results for "personal need"

4560 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4560 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals in Specific Performance and Permanent Injunction. Trial Court Dismissed Specific Performance Suit and Decreed Injunction; Plaintiff's Claim of Agreement to Sell and Possession Not Accepted, Subsequent Purchaser's Possession Protected.

The Regular First Appeals arose from a common judgment dated 13.09.2005 by the I Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in two suits: O....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal and Remands Murder Case for Fresh Trial Due to Denial of Fair Trial. Conviction Under Sections 498A and 302 IPC Set Aside as Non-Examination of Medical and Forensic Witnesses and Non-Marking of Postmortem Report Vitiates Trial and Violates Article 21.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Madhugiri, which convicted the appellant, the husband of the deceas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Final Order in Writ Petition Challenging Minutes of Committee of Creditors Meeting under IBC, 2016. Key Issue Involved Adequacy of Notice under Section 24 and Natural Justice in Approval of Resolution Plan.

The writ petitioner, a suspended director of Associate Decor Limited (a company under corporate insolvency resolution process), challenged the minutes...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Criminal Petition and Quashes NDPS Proceedings Against Accused No.12 for Unlawful Arrest. Absence of Lawful Arrest Under Section 35 BNSS Renders Medical Examination and FSL Report Inadmissible Under Section 51 BNSS.

The Karnataka High Court, in a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Naga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Petition. Company Appeal No.19 of 2009 Challenges CLB's Findings on Reduction of Shareholding, Removal of Director, and Valuation of Land Under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The case involved a dispute between shareholders of Pantheon Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., a company formed to acquire and develop a 13-acre property in M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in IPC Offences Case. The Court Found No Perversity in Trial Court’s Acquittal for Charges of Dowry Harassment, Murder, and Causing Disappearance of Evidence.

The State of Maharashtra appealed the acquittal of three accused—the husband, his elder brother, and the brother’s wife—for offences of cruelty ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petition on Octroi Duty Classification of Rubber Goods. Court Directs Development Commissioner's Opinion on Commercial Identity and Trade Usage of Imported Items Under Maharashtra Municipality Octroi Rules.

The writ petition was filed by Ceat Tyres of India Ltd., a tyre manufacturer, challenging octroi duty demand notices issued by the Nashik Municipal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Adjudicates Constitutional Challenge to Article 19 of Decree No.35461 on Enforcement of Ecclesiastical Annulment Decrees. Petitions Seek to Nullify Canonical Marriage Annulments and Prevent Civil Endorsements, Questioning the Validity of Pre-Constitution Colonial Law.

Two writ petitions were heard together. In Writ Petition No.351 of 2017, the petitioner wife married the fourth respondent on 26 September 2009 under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Ejectment Decree Against Licensee in Maharashtra Rent Control Act Case. Licensee Cannot Claim Protection When Original Tenant Is a Government Company Exempted Under Section 3(1)(b) of the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The dispute arose from a suit for ejectment filed by the respondent landlords (original plaintiffs) against the applicant licensee and the original te...