WRIT PETITION NO. 5290 OF 2013
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "flat scheme"
1142 result(s) found
Found 1142 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Enhances Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Housing Scheme — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 50 per sqm Based on Comparable Sale Deed. Claimant's Appeal for Further Enhancement Dismissed as No Higher Comparable Evidence Was Provided.
4 Mar 2014The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Reference Court in Land Acquisition Case No. 134/2000. The land belonging to the a...
- 135
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Co-operative Society's Bye-law Amendment for Lack of Quorum. Amendment to Bye-law 26(c) set aside as meeting lacked quorum under Section 75 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, a member of the respondent co-operative housing society, challenged the validity of an amendment to Bye-law 26(c) passed at a general ...
- 181
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired KVIC Employee Challenging Withdrawal of Pension and Recovery of Paid Pension. Pension is a Right, Not a Bounty, and Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Statutory Authority Under Regulation 15 of KVIC Employees Pension Regulations 1984.
8 Sep 2015The petitioner, A.K. Kumaran Nair, joined the U.P. Khadi and Village Industries Board on 15 June 1982. The Board was taken over by the Khadi and Villa...
- 144
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Direct Recruitment of Regional Officers in Maharashtra Pollution Control Board. Service Regulations Permitted 50% Direct Recruitment and Advertisement for Three Posts Was Valid as Per Quota.
13 Jun 2016The petitioners, employees of the Maharashtra Pollution Control Board, challenged an advertisement dated 06.06.2002 issued by the Board for filling th...
- 301
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — Registered Proprietor's Rights Protected Against Deceptively Similar Marks. The court affirmed the trial court's order granting interim injunction restraining the defendant from using marks deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark 'Prem Mehandi Centre' under Sections 28, 29, 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
19 Oct 2016The respondent/plaintiff, proprietor of 'Prem Mehandi Centre', filed two suits (Suit No. 1 of 2015 and Suit No. 2 of 2015) against the appellants/defe...
- 124
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes ESIC Compulsory Service Bond for MBBS Graduates — Bond Violates Right to Practice Profession Under Article 19(1)(g) and Lacks Statutory Backing. The court held that the bond requiring MBBS graduates to serve ESIC for 5 years is an unreasonable restriction without statutory authority.
14 Feb 2020The petitioners, MBBS graduates who completed their PG or MBBS from ESIC Medical College, were directed by the ESIC Corporation to execute a bond for ...
- 721
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Seizure of Motor Vehicles for Tax Arrears — Held That Procedure Under Section 8 of Karnataka Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1957 Must Be Followed Before Detention. The court quashed the seizure of vehicles by the respondents for non-compliance with mandatory notice and hearing requirements under Section 8 of the Act.
10 Mar 2016The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging the seizure and detention of m...
- 138
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Builder's Challenge to Demolition Notice for Unauthorized Construction in Chennai. Court Holds Regularization is Not an Absolute Right; Unauthorized Commercial Floors Constructed Beyond Approved Plan Must Be Demolished Under Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act.
10 Feb 2025The petitioner, a construction company, challenged a removal notice issued by the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) dated 28.11.2023, ...
- 56
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Amendments to Karnataka Agricultural Produce Marketing Act. Petitioners Seek Declaration that Deletion of 'Trader' from Section 72 and Insertion of Rule 76-A are Unconstitutional.
12 Oct 2017The present proceedings comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka, Kalaburagi Bench, under Articles 226 and 227 of ...
- 45
