Search Results for "corresponding provision"

2176 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2176 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Under Article 227 Against Revisional Order Upholding Eviction Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act. Licensee Company Challenges Jurisdiction, Arguing Non-Applicability of Act Due to Paid-Up Capital Exceeding Rs. 1 Crore Under Section 3(1)(b).

Background: The matter involves a dispute between licensors (owners of a flat in Galaxy Apartments, Bandra) and a licensee company (petitioner no. 1) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Notice under MVAT Act as Assessments Not Time-Barred. Extended Limitation Periods under Section 21(3) and Section 23(3A) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2005 Applied to Pre-2008 Assessment Years.

The case arose from a writ petition filed by Sahyadri Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a cooperative sugar mill and registered dealer under the Maharash...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Anticipatory Bail Application in POCSO and Atrocities Act Case - Section 42-A POCSO Act Prevails Over Section 14-A Atrocities Act, Making Section 438 CrPC Maintainable.

The case involved an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC by Aniket Labade, accused of offences under IPC, POCSO Act, and SC/ST Act. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Port Trust's Eviction Notices for Unauthorized Occupants. Held that lessees/licensees whose tenures expired and who continued in possession without consent are unauthorized occupants liable to eviction under the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963.

The judgment concerns a group of writ petitions filed by various entities who were originally lessees or licensees of land belonging to the Board of T...