Search Results for "Supreme Court discretionary power"

1790 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1790 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Enforcement of Contract for Supply of Electricity Meters. Contractual Dispute Not Amenable to Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, M/s Landis+Gyr Limited, a supplier of electricity meters, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Railway Eviction Notice for Non-Compliance with Statutory Requirements. Notice under Section 4 of the Railway Land (Unauthorised Occupation) Act, 1966 must specify the period of occupation and be served on the person in occupation.

The petitioners, Bhupendra Villa Premises Co-operative Society Limited, M/s. Ramesh Builders, and Rajen Harshadlal Sanghvi, filed a writ petition unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part and Refers Question of Law to Larger Bench in MSMED Act Dispute. Registration Under Section 8 of MSMED Act, 2006 Not a Precondition for Reference Under Section 18, but Issue Requires Authoritative Determination by Three-Judge Bench.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by NBCC (India) Ltd. against the State of West Bengal and others, concerning a dispute with M/s Saket Infra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for MRTS Project — High Court Direction for Alternate Site Quashed. Court holds that once acquisition is complete and possession taken, no direction for alternate site can be issued under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves appeals by the State of Tamil Nadu against a common judgment of the Madras High Court directing allotment of alternate land to priva...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Rajesh @ Venkatesha @ Raja @ Raju, was convicted by the District and Sessions Judge, Kodagu, Madikeri, in Sessions Case No.58/2006 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Criminal Petition, Quashes Trial Court Order Rejecting Deferment of Cross-Examination Under Section 231(2) Cr.P.C. -- Accused in IPC Offences Including Section 302 Granted Relief to Prevent Prejudice in Defence Disclosure

The petitioners, accused in a sessions case involving grave offences under the IPC, sought deferment of cross-examination of witnesses under Section 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Rejection of Candidature Due to Unnotified Qualifying Marks for Kannada Language Test. Fixation of Minimum Qualifying Marks After Examination Concluded Violates Principles of Fairness and Transparency Under Article 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, a Junior Training Officer at Government ITI College, Dhulkhed, challenged the endorsement issued by respondent No.3 (General Manager (...