Search Results for "Section 19(2)"

959 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 959 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Notice Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 — Complainant Failed to Prove Service of Demand Notice on Accused.

The petitioner, Jogen C. Thakkar, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Sale by Brother for Legal Necessity Upheld. Daughters' Claim for Partition Dismissed as Sale Deed Dated 28.3.1968 Was Supported by Legal Necessity and Prior Conditional Sale.

The case involves a partition suit filed by two daughters (plaintiffs) against their brother Tukaram and the appellant (defendant no.1), who purchased...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Rash Driving and Causing Death by Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC Upheld Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The petitioner, Domnic Luis, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Margao, for offences under Sections 279 (rash driving) and 304-A (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Husband in Murder Case Based on Dying Declaration. Concurrent findings of guilt under Sections 302 and 342 IPC affirmed as dying declaration was properly recorded, consistent, and credible, meeting admissibility criteria under evidence law.

The Supreme Court considered a criminal appeal challenging concurrent convictions for murder and wrongful confinement. The appellant was accused of be...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reserves Judgment on Cross Appeals in Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Dispute. Court Considers Market Value Determination and Development Charges Deduction for Acquired Land.

The case involved cross appeals arising from a land acquisition compensation dispute under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The landowner, Nalini, owne...