High Court of Karnataka Examines Government Order on Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration. Dispute Pertains to Control and Management of Temple as per Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950.
10 Aug 2018...
Search Results for "Detailed Project Report"
923 result(s) found
Found 923 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires a subjective satisfaction based on relevant material, and mere pendency of disciplinary proceedings or adverse entries without a review committee recommendation cannot sustain the order.
2 Mar 2016The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...
- 158
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement of Family Court Judge in Public Interest — Rule 10(4) Pension Rules Invoked Without Sufficient Material. Court holds that compulsory retirement under Rule 10(4) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 read with Rule 19 of Maharashtra Judicial Services Rules, 2008 requires formation of opinion based on relevant material and cannot be passed mechanically or without application of mind.
2 Mar 2016The petitioner, Dr. Chitra Bhedi, was a Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur. She was compulsorily retired in public interest by an order dated 3rd Octob...
- 81
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Auction of Mineral Block Due to Technical Glitch. Alleged Portal Failure Not Sufficient to Invalidate Auction Where Petitioner Failed to Demonstrate Prejudice and Did Not Follow Up After Initial Technical Issue.
25 Jun 2026The petitioner, Agravanshi Private Limited, challenged the auction process for Cavorem-Maina Mineral Block No. XVIII conducted by MSTC Limited on beha...
- 53
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Tribunal's Order Upheld for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for alleged concealment of income was deleted by the Tribunal on finding no deliberate concealment.
11 Sep 2013The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribu...
- 83
High Court
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Professor Selection in Marathi Department. Court Upholds Selection Committee's Discretion in Assessing API Scores and Interview Performance, Affirms Appellate Authority's Order Under Section 76(7) of Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994.
29 Jan 2019The petitioner, Dr. Pramod Munghate, challenged the selection and appointment of respondent No.3 as Professor in Marathi at the University of Mumbai. ...
- 151
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Bank Officer in Securities Scam Case — Departmental Inquiry Findings Not Vitiated by Delay or Lack of Evidence. The court held that the petitioner, an Assistant General Manager, was validly compulsorily retired for misconduct in allowing irregular transactions through a broker's account, causing loss to the bank.
31 Jul 2017The petitioner, A.D. Padhey, was an Assistant General Manager with the State Bank of India, heading the Personal Banking Division. He was served with ...
- 71
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Winding-Up Petition for Disputed Debt and Lack of Jurisdiction — Foreign Company Cannot Seek Winding-Up of Indian Company Under Sections 433(e), 434 of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that a winding-up petition is not maintainable when the debt is bona fide disputed and the petitioner is a foreign company without a registered office in India.
28 Jul 2015The petitioner, M/s. Arasor Corporation, a company incorporated in the United States of America, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f...
- 60
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Goa University's Challenge to Town Planning Board Directions and Allows Dr. Shetye's Complaint Regarding Illegal Compound Wall. The Court held that the University's construction of a compound wall without leaving access to neighboring properties was unauthorized and that the regularization order did not legalize the wall without proper plans.
25 Nov 2024The judgment concerns two writ petitions: WP No.414/2023 filed by Goa University challenging an order of the Town and Country Planning Board dated 20....
- 411
