Search Results for "substantive offence"

2173 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2173 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Deputy Commissioner of Excise in Corruption Case — Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside due to unreliable trap witnesses and lack of corroboration.

The appellant, Shivananda Bankolli, was the Deputy Commissioner of Excise at Mysore. He was convicted by the Principal Sessions Judge & Special Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Cruelty Case Due to Insufficient Evidence of Homicidal Death and Compounding of Offence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Establish Murder, and Section 498-A Conviction Quashed on Compromise.

The case involves two appeals filed against the judgment and order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No.116/2000. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Articles Confirm Guilt Under Sections 302, 364, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Channappa @ Channu @ Channya Gangannawar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge at Margao for the murder of Renuka, the wife o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder in Jealousy-Driven Attack. Conviction under Sections 302 and 324 read with Section 34 IPC confirmed as evidence of common intention and fatal injuries established beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Sarang and Nihal Zade, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for the murder of Naved and causing hurt to Hasim,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Rape and Murder of Four-Year-Old Girl. Conviction under Sections 302, 376(2)(i), 377, 363, 366, 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code Upheld for Acts Committed in Furtherance of Common Intention.

The case arises from a reference under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for confirmation of the death sentence and an appeal agains...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench Hears Confirmation of Death Sentence Awarded for Triple Murder and Appeal Challenging Conviction. Convict Argues Prosecution Evidence Including Dying Declarations and Eyewitness Testimony is Unreliable and Seizure Under Section 27 of Indian Evidence Act is Invalid.

The High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Bench heard a reference for confirmation of death sentence and an appeal filed by the convict Imdad Ali Waid Ali Sa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Hears Appeals Against Conviction for Abduction, Murder, Robbery, and Conspiracy. The Appellants Contended That Lodging Two FIRs for the Same Transaction Vitiated the Trial and That Circumstantial Evidence Was Insufficient.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard four criminal appeals against a common judgment of the Sessions Court in Sessions Case No. 50/2009, which convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Confirms Death Sentence and Dismisses Appeals in Triple Murder Case. Murder Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Upheld Based on Eyewitness Testimony and Medical Evidence.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, heard a Criminal Confirmation Case along with three criminal appeals arising from the judgment a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape of Minor Domestic Worker, Dismisses Cross-Appeals. Testimony of Prosecutrix and Circumstantial Evidence Found Sufficient Under Section 376 IPC Despite Hostile Witness and No DNA Test.

The prosecution case involved a minor maid servant (Ms. X) who was employed by Accused No. 2 in Mumbai and was sexually assaulted by Accused No. 1, th...