Search Results for "possession delay"

3781 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3781 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Company Paid Peon for Dereliction of Duty in Handing Over Leased Assets. Official Liquidator's recommendation for removal from service sanctioned due to grave misconduct in failing to ensure proper handover of leased equipment.

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking sanction to terminate the services of Shri S.M. Shetty, a company paid Group 'D' Peon, for misconduct i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Earlier Refusal to Extend Mandate Under Section 29A of Arbitration Act — Refusal to Extend Mandate Does Not Terminate Arbitral Proceedings or Bar Fresh Appointment Under Section 11.

The case involves a dispute arising out of a Deed of Assignment of Development Rights dated 6 December 2010 between the applicants (Nalin Vallabhbhai ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 392 IPC set aside as sole testimony of victim was not corroborated by independent witnesses and identification parade was not conducted properly.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by three accused persons (K. Ramanji @ Ramanjaneyudu, S.V. Ramanatha, and Amarendra) against their convic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitration Award in Property Dispute — No Grounds for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award based on joint family property partition and limitation, finding no patent illegality or perversity.

The petitioners, who were members of a joint family, challenged an arbitral award passed in a partition dispute. The award had been made by an arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Mortgage Redemption Suit — Appellant Entitled to Redemption Despite Delay. Court holds that a mortgagor's right to redeem continues until foreclosure or sale, and mere delay does not extinguish the right unless there is a decree for foreclosure.

The present appeal arises from a suit for redemption of mortgage filed by the appellant (plaintiff No.2) along with respondent No.2 (plaintiff No.1) a...