WRIT PETITION NO. 2987 OF 2018
3 Jun 2019The judgment, rendered on 3 June 2019 by Justice G.S. Kulkarni of the Bombay High Court, was a writ petition concerning a Slum Rehabilitation Scheme o...
Search Results for "extraordinary original jurisdiction"
1257 result(s) found
Found 1257 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — No Error Apparent on Record. Petitioner's challenge to SRA's refusal to grant occupancy certificate fails as review court finds no mistake or error in original judgment.
16 Oct 2025The petitioner, Mumtaz H. Khoja, filed a review petition against the judgment dated 16 October 2025 passed by the Bombay High Court in Writ Petition N...
- 140
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Succession Dispute Over Muslim Property — Appellants' Claim to Inherit as Heirs of Deceased Upheld. Court held that the trial court and first appellate court erred in dismissing the suit for partition and possession without properly considering the evidence of relationship and the applicability of Muslim personal law.
30 Nov -0001The case involves two second appeals arising from a suit for partition and possession filed by the appellants, who claimed to be the legal heirs of th...
- 133
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes High Court Order Transferring Investigation to NIA in West Bengal Bomb Incidents — State Police Investigation Upheld as Adequate. High Court's reliance on alleged bomb use and handwriting similarity found insufficient to warrant transfer under Section 6(5) of NIA Act, 2008.
1 Jan 2023The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the State of West Bengal against a Division Bench order of the Calcutta High Court dated 27 April 2023. ...
- 83
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of Import Fee on Rectified Spirit Used for Potable Liquor. Levy Held Valid as Regulatory Fee Under Jharkhand Excise Act, 1915, as Rectified Spirit Used for Manufacture of Intoxicating Liquor Falls Within State's Legislative Competence Under Entry 8 List II.
2 Jul 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Jharkhand against the judgment of the Jharkhand High Court which had quashed a notification...
- 195
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Magistrate to Order Voice Sample of Accused in Criminal Investigation. Article 20(3) Does Not Bar Compelled Voice Sample as It Is Not Testimonial Evidence Under Section 53 CrPC.
2 Aug 2019The case arises from an FIR lodged on 7th December 2009 at Sadar Bazar Police Station, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, alleging that Dhoom Singh and appell...
- 324
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SAFEMA Notice Against Family Members of Convicted NDPS Offender. Property Attachment Under SAFEMA Sections 68A-68I Upheld as Independent of Criminal Trial Outcome.
3 Sep 2025The petitioners, Zaibunissa Ebrahim Khan, Junaid Ebrahim Khan, Faizal Ebrahim Khan, Imran Ebrahim Khan, and Afzal Ebrahim Khan, are family members of ...
- 107
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Defence Land Claim Over Leasehold Property. Petitioner's Title Not Established Against Union of India's Claim of Ownership Over Land Leased to Colaba Land & Mill Company.
19 Dec 2011The petitioner, TCI Industries Limited, claimed to be a lessee of land admeasuring 10.264 acres in Colaba, Mumbai, by virtue of an Indenture of Assign...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award on Regularisation of Canteen Workers. Contract Labour System Upheld as Genuine, Not a Sham, and Workers Not Entitled to Direct Employment by Principal Employer.
31 Aug 2006The judgment arises from a writ petition filed by Contract Laghu Udyog Kamgar Union challenging an award of the Industrial Tribunal dated 19th March 2...
- 102
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Appointment of Court Receiver in Redevelopment Dispute Between Society, Developer, and Occupants. Court Directs Handover of Possession Subject to Payment of Compensation Under Development Agreement.
10 Jul 2015The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge appointing the Court Receiver as Receiver of two flats occupied by the appellants and direc...
- 179
