Search Results for "direct oral evidence"

4641 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4641 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Bhaurao s/o Raghoji Ingole, a retired headmaster, was convicted by the Special Judge, Washim in Special Case No.2/2002 for offences und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Bar Council and Advocates Against Order to Provide Free Legal Aid to Poor Litigants. Court Upholds Constitutional Duty of State and Bar to Ensure Access to Justice Under Article 39A of the Constitution of India.

The case arose from a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, the Bombay Advocates Association, and two individual advo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Instigation. Allegations of Harassment Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 306 IPC.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Gangadhar and Anitha, husband and wife, against their conviction by the Principal Sessions Judge, Shim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Were Undated, Not Read Over, and Recorded in Marathi While Deceased Knew Only Urdu.

The appellant, Mohammad Ejaz, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 498-A (cruelty by husband) and 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Murder Conviction Under IPC Sections 301/302 and 307. Conviction upheld based on credible eyewitness testimony despite alleged contradictions, non-recovery of weapon, and acquittal of co-accused, as evidence sufficiently established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arose from a murder conviction where the appellant, Ram Singh, was convicted under Section 301 read with Section 302 of the Indian Penal Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Writ Petition Challenging Civil Judge’s Orders on Cancellation of Evidence and Examination of Unnamed Witness. Orders Set Aside as Civil Court Lacked Power to Cancel Tendered Evidence and Leave Under Order XVI Rule 1(3) CPC Was Not Properly Obtained.

A partnership firm filed a civil suit against the petitioners for delivery of possession and mesne profits. The suit was pending before the Civil Judg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case — No Interference with Well-Reasoned Acquittal. Dying Declarations Found Inconsistent and Unreliable; Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 302, 498-A, 306 IPC.

The petitioner, father of the deceased, filed a criminal revision application challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated 21.04.2007 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Yuvraj Sampatrao Ghorpade, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of an unknown male under Section 302 IPC and for causing dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Acquittal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Complainant Fails to Prove Debt Legally Enforceable. Loan of Rs. 1,00,000 advanced by LIC agent to acquaintance not proved as legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The complainant-appellant, Sharanappa, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment ...