Search Results for "civil suit limitation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "civil suit limitation"

3689 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3689 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Rejection of Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme Declaration in Respect of Wealth Tax Arrears of Deceased Assessee; Appeal Pending Despite Dismissal on Limitation. Court Examines Whether an Appeal Against Refusal to Condone Delay Constitutes a Pending Appeal Under Section 95(i)(c) of Finance (No.2) Act, 1998, Making Declarant Eligible.

25 Oct 2005

The petition arose from the rejection of the petitioner's declarations under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 in respect of the wealth-tax arrears ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Limitation Is a Triable Issue. The court held that under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC, only plaint averments are relevant and if they disclose a cause of action, the plaint cannot be rejected; limitation is a mixed question of law and fact.

30 Nov -0001

The applicant, Mr. Ajay Wadhwa, who was original defendant No.9 in the suit, filed a Notice of Motion seeking rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Ru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Land Revenue Dispute — Finds No Error in Revenue Authority's Order Based on Prior Civil Court Decree. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title and Petition Barred by Delay and Laches.

28 Apr 2014

The petitioners, legal heirs of Laxman Shankar Bandgar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Deputy Collector (Land Reforms), Latur, dat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Declaration and Permanent Injunction. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession, Suit Barred by Limitation.

17 Jul 2025

The dispute concerned agricultural land bearing R.S.No.21, Block No.36 situated in Teredkoppa village, originally part of the Talawar family holdings....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Commercial Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Factual Issues and Interpretation of Contractual Terms Are Not Open to Reappreciation in a Section 34 Petition.

2 Apr 2026

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 30/09/2024 passed b...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Not Barred Under Section 34 When Challenge is to Mortgage Validity and Bank's Actions, Not Recovery Proceedings. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act does not apply to a suit seeking declaration of title and challenging the validity of a mortgage, as such issues are not within the jurisdiction of the Debt Recovery Tribunal.

16 Jul 2021

The appellant, Smt. Nanjamma, filed a civil suit (O.S.No.3780/2017) before the XXII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, seeking a dec...

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition for Refund of IGST on Ocean Freight -- Sets Aside Appellate Order Directing Limitation Verification -- Reliance on Precedents for Mistake of Law Refunds

16 Jan 2026

The petitioners imported fertilizers on CIF basis, paying IGST on ocean freight under reverse charge mechanism as per RCM Notification No.10/2017. Aft...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Application to Reopen Evidence in Civil Suit. Trial Court's Discretion Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Upheld as Defendants Had Sufficient Opportunity to Cross-Examine Witness.

25 Aug 2011

The petitioners, who were the original defendants in Special Civil Suit No.74/2010 pending before the Second Joint Civil Judge, Satara, filed four wri...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Possession Suit — Appellant's Adverse Possession Claim Fails Due to Lack of Evidence of Hostile Possession and Non-Payment of Court Fee on Counterclaim. The court held that mere long possession without hostile animus does not constitute adverse possession under the Limitation Act, 1963.

17 Nov 2021

The present appeal arises from a decree for possession passed by the trial court in O.S.No.77/1999. The respondents (plaintiffs) claimed that the suit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Defendant's Appeal in Land Dispute and Quashes Permanent Injunction Granted to Plaintiff. Court held that when plaintiff fails to obtain declaration of title and suit for cancellation of sale deed is time-barred, permanent injunction to protect possession cannot be granted as it is a consequential relief and requires lawful possession under Specific Relief Act, 1963.

3 Mar 2022

The dispute involved agricultural land where the plaintiff's husband executed a registered sale deed in 1975 in favor of the defendant for the entire ...

81 82 83 84 85

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)