Search Results for "bombay tenancy act"

1776 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1776 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Restores Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit for Possession. Partition Deed of 1951 Held Not Proved, and Plaintiffs Failed to Establish Title and Possession Over Suit House.

The case involves a property dispute between two branches of the Lohi family. The plaintiffs, sons and daughter of late Sheshrao Lohi, filed a suit fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Suit Seeking Removal of Managing Director on Ground of Age Limit Under Companies Act, 2013. Section 196(3)(a) of Companies Act, 2013 Held Not Retrospective and Does Not Automatically Terminate Existing Appointments.

The plaintiff, a director of Ultramarine & Pigments Limited, filed a suit seeking an order to restrain the 2nd defendant, the Chairman and Managing Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Considers Petitions Against Infrastructure Cost Levies by Nagpur Metropolitan Regional Development Authority. The Petitions Raise Constitutional and Statutory Challenges Under Articles 14, 265 and the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966.

The dispute arose from demands for infrastructure cost and STP charges made by the Nagpur Metropolitan Regional Development Authority (NMRDA) against ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revocation of Probate Petition for Lack of Just Cause Under Section 263 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Court holds that mere existence of other legal heirs does not constitute fraud when probate was granted after due citation and without objection.

The case involves a petition for revocation of probate filed by Dinesh Madhukar Parshetye (the petitioner) under Section 263(b) of the Indian Successi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Tenancy Dispute Due to Delayed Suo-Motu Inquiry Under Section 84-C of Bombay Tenancy & Agricultural Lands Act, 1948. Three-Year Delay in Initiating Inquiry Held Unreasonable, Forfeiture Order Quashed.

The petitioner, Appa Dadu Patil, through his power of attorney holder, challenged the orders passed by the Tenancy Avval Karkoon, the Sub-Divisional O...