Search Results for "appeal scope"

8641 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8641 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Delay Condonation in Specific Performance Suit by Non-Party to Contract. Limitation Act Section 5 Delay of 254 Days Condoned as Sufficient Cause Shown for First Appeal Delay.

The appellant filed two suits for specific performance of agreements of sale for agricultural land in Himachal Pradesh. The suits were dismissed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessee's Claim for Damages in Wild Life Sanctuary Case — No Right to Compensation Without Acquisition. Notification Under Section 18 of Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 Does Not Confer Right to Damages for Loss of Use.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by M/s Natesan Agencies (Plantations), a partnership firm, against the judgment of the Madras High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Bombay Tenancy Act Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Section 32M Cannot Be Challenged After 9 Years. The Court Held That the Certificate Is Conclusive and the Landlord Cannot Seek Termination of Tenancy After the Tenant Has Purchased the Land.

The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding agricultural land bearing Gat No. 98 in village Tilleha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Insufficient Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as last seen theory and recovery of articles were not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pandurang Narayan Kadam, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded, for the murder of Balaji Shinde under Section 302 of the Indian P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Civil Application for Lack of Error Apparent on Record. Court holds that review is not an appeal in disguise and that the judgment under review did not suffer from any error apparent on the face of the record.

The applicants, who were the original respondents in the main petition, filed a review application under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Against KERC Order on Solar Power Tariff. The Dispute Centers on Whether Commissioning Certificate or Actual Injection of Power Determines Commercial Operation Date Under the Power Purchase Agreement.

The petitioner, a solar power developer, challenged an order of the Karnataka Electricity Regulatory Commission (KERC) that denied a higher tariff by ...