Search Results for "Sale Pending Suit"

3116 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3116 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Partition Suit. Court Holds That Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC When Averments Disclose a Cause of Action, Even If Ancestral Character of Property Is Disputed.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Mohan Hirachand Shah (defendant no.1) against an order of the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possessors to Pay Decretal Amount to Avoid Auction in Execution Proceedings. Decree Holder Cannot Insist on Auction When Possessor Willing to Satisfy Decree Under Order 21 Rules 64 and 83 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The petitioners, Lalit Malick, Shyam Malick, and Madhu Bhatti, filed a writ petition challenging the execution proceedings of a decree passed in Comme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Impleadment of Liquidator in Pending Salary Recovery Suit -- Interprets IBC Provisions on Continuation of Proceedings Post-Liquidation -- Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing Chamber Summons

The Petitioner, a former employee of Respondent No.1 company, had filed a Summary Suit in 2017 for recovery of salary dues -- After the company went i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Promoter's Writ Petition Challenging Deemed Conveyance under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act. Dispute Involves Whether Deemed Conveyance Can Be Granted for Entire Plot During Ongoing Phase-Wise Development Under Section 11(3) of MOFA.

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a promoter/developer challenging an order of the District Deputy Registrar, Pune that granted deemed c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reverses Lower Appellate Court's Erroneous Reversal of Trial Court's Decree. The Court Held That the First Appellate Court Must Reappreciate Evidence Independently and That a Co-Owner Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Without Ouster.

The present second appeal arises from a partition suit filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) against the appell...