COMM ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 543 OF 2025
29 Jul 2026The background of the case involves the acquisition of land admeasuring 1113.2 sq. mtrs. belonging to the predecessor of Respondents 1 and 2 by the Pe...
Search Results for "Cooperative Court jurisdiction"
2278 result(s) found
Found 2278 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition in Date of Birth Dispute — Employee Failed to Prove Error in Service Record. Labour Court's Order to Correct Date of Birth Set Aside as Employee's Claim Was Unsubstantiated and Made at the Fag End of Service.
10 Mar 2017The petitioner, Shri Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Limited, a cooperative sugar factory, challenged the judgments of the Labour Court and Indus...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Bombay Tenancy Act Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Section 32M Cannot Be Challenged After 9 Years. The Court Held That the Certificate Is Conclusive and the Landlord Cannot Seek Termination of Tenancy After the Tenant Has Purchased the Land.
10 Jan 2012The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding agricultural land bearing Gat No. 98 in village Tilleha...
- 120
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit Due to Buyer's Acceptance of Refund During Pendency. Acceptance of Refund of Earnest Money Indicates Lack of Readiness and Willingness, Making Suit Not Maintainable Under Specific Relief Act, 1963.
4 Apr 2025The dispute arose from a suit for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 25th January 2008, executed between the buyer (Respondent No.1) a...
- 313
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.
1 Jan 2020The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...
- 424
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Injunction and Possession. The court held that under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, interference with concurrent findings of fact is not warranted unless there is a perverse finding or patent error of law.
30 Nov -0001The petitioner, Zircon Venture Cooperative Housing Society Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the ...
- 152
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitioners Challenging Enquiry Under Section 88 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act Against Contractors and Suppliers. Enquiry Under Section 88 Cannot Be Conducted Against Persons Who Are Not Members, Past Members, or Office Bearers of the Cooperative Society.
8 Jun 2010The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Tejas Constructions (a partnership firm) and ATV Projects India Ltd. (a company) challenging...
- 78
High Court
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging Compulsory Purchase Order Under Income Tax Act. Suit Seeking Declaration That Compulsory Purchase Order Stood Abrogated Was Barred by Section 269-UN and Section 293 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Which Exclude Civil Court Jurisdiction.
25 Apr 2025The appeal was filed against the order dated 7th April 2014 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the plaintiff's suit ...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Application for Further Evidence in Cooperative Dispute. Court holds that once evidence is closed and arguments have commenced, reopening evidence at a belated stage is impermissible under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.
11 Dec 2023The petitioner, Mr. Pralhad Chavatrao Lawand, filed three writ petitions challenging orders passed by the learned Judge, Cooperative Court, Solapur, r...
- 55
