Search Results for "Collector permission"

1829 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1829 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Caste Certificate Invalidation Under Maharashtra Act 23 of 2001. Petitioner Raises Issues of Committee Constitution and Affinity Test Inadequacy Against Scrutiny Committee Order.

The matter involved a challenge to the Caste Scrutiny Committee's order invalidating the petitioner's claim to belong to the Halba Scheduled Tribe und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Double Acquisition of Land in Land Acquisition Case — Acquisition Proceedings Quashed as Land Already Acquired Once and Partitioned Thereafter. Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Section 4(1) — Double acquisition of same land not permissible.

The petitioners, Devram Govind Gadge and Vitthal Govind Gadge, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition proceedings initiated by the Special ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petition Concerning Nursery Exemption in Land Acquisition for Dr. Shivarama Karanth Layout. Petitioner claims exemption under Government Order dated 01-01-1987 for nursery land acquired for layout formation.

Background: The case involves acquisition of land for the formation of a residential layout known as Dr. Shivarama Karanth Layout by the Bangalore Dev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Combined PIL and Writ Petition on Unauthorized Construction and Allotment of Shops by Gram Panchayat; Authorities Direct Sealing and Cancellation of Allotments Citing Violation of Section 51(1) of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act

The matter concerns a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) and a connected Writ Petition challenging the construction and allotment of shops by Gram Panch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Delay Condonation in Mutation Entry Challenge. Court holds that delay in challenging mutation entry cannot be attributed to petitioner when authorities failed to comply with statutory duty under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code.

The petitioners, Shankarrao Premaji Banarase and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Nagpur challenging the order dated 30/0...