Search Results for "property identification"

1086 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1086 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Theft by Clerk Under Section 381 IPC. Discovery of Stolen Property Under Section 27 Evidence Act Sufficient for Conviction in Absence of Direct Evidence.

The case involves a criminal revision filed by Sunil Madhukar Morwal against his conviction under Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for theft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive and last seen theory beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Venkati s/o Balaji Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, for the murder of his half-brother Tukaram under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Quia Timet Action for Passing Off Based on Distinctive Bottle Shape of Vodka. Shape of a bottle can be protected as a trademark or get-up if it has acquired distinctiveness and is likely to cause confusion.

The plaintiff, Gorbatschow Wodka KG, a German company manufacturing Vodka, filed a quia timet action against John Distilleries Limited alleging that t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants in Grievous Hurt Case. Cousins convicted under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC for attacking victims with dangerous weapons, sentence of 7 years rigorous imprisonment confirmed.

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 326 read with Section 34 IPC. The appellants, Ramesh, Gopal, and Eknath Mahajan, were con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Requiring Proof of Will Under Section 68 of Evidence Act. Admission of Contents in Plaint Does Not Dispense with Examination of Attesting Witnesses for Proving Execution of Will.

The petitioner, original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 12.9.2012 passed by the 6th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nashik, in a suit f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View Element. Alleged Caste-Based Insults Occurred Inside Police Station, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioners, eight individuals including a legal practitioner and agriculturists, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Defendants Against Remand Order in Civil Suit — Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Order 41 Rule 23 CPC. Remand for Retrial Not Permissible When Trial Was Fair and Parties Had Opportunity to Lead Evidence.

The appellants, original defendants in a civil suit, challenged an order dated 13 July 2010 passed by the learned Extra Jt. Ad-hoc District Judge, Sat...