Search Results for "oral tenancy"

1160 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1160 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widows' Petition for Succession Certificate Under Section 372 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 — Held That Widows and Minor Children of Deceased Coparceners Are Entitled to Equal Share in Joint Family Property Despite Objections by Male Coparceners.

The petitioners, being the widows and minor children of deceased coparceners (Abhay Vithal Mandle, Raosaheb Vithal Mandle, and Baban Vithal Mandle), f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Rent Act Suit — Leave and License Agreement Not a Camouflage. Court upholds Small Causes Court's finding that no landlord-tenant relationship existed between plaintiff and defendant under Bombay Rent Act, 1947.

The petitioner, Dinesh Vasantrai Bhuta, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and decree passed by the Appellate Bench of the Small Causes Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Slump Sale Case. Transfer of IMFL Business as Going Concern Not Subject to Capital Gains Tax Under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The case involves an appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Trial Court Order on Valuation and Court Fees in Suit for Share in CIDCO Plots. The court set aside the order directing revaluation and payment of additional court fees as it was passed without any evidence or inquiry.

The petitioners, original defendants in Regular Civil Suit No.61 of 2006, challenged an order dated 5/10/2010 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Sale Deed Not a Sham Transaction. Appellant failed to prove that sale deed dated 3.2.1975 was without consideration or a sham document; concurrent findings of courts below upheld.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Shashikant Haribhau Bandewar (appellant-plaintiff) and Bhalchandra Haribhau Bandewar (respo...